The Phillip Spiegel Orthopaedic Research Laboratory at the Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jul;20(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is being used with greater frequency for patients with severe rotator cuff deficiency. There are several commercially available reverse shoulder devices, each with different glenosphere options. The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) forces at the baseplate-bone interface in glenospheres with centers of rotation located concentrically and eccentrically to the center of the baseplate; and (2) if baseplate-bone forces can be optimized by altering tilt of the baseplate.
A validated computer model was used to compare concentric glenospheres with neutral offset to eccentrically offset glenospheres (6 mm inferior or 6 mm lateral) in 3 baseplate tilts: 15° inferior, neutral, or 15° superior. A baseplate, simulated bone, screws, and humeral component were modeled, and forces underneath the baseplate were calculated as the arm was abducted through 90° of glenohumeral motion.
For lateral and concentric glenospheres, inferior tilt provides the most even distribution of forces (mean difference in force between superior and inferior portions of baseplate: 11.3 N and 24.7 N, respectively) and superior tilt provides the most uneven distribution of forces (109.3 N and 78.7 N, respectively). For inferior eccentric glenospheres, inferior tilt provides the most uneven distribution of forces (58.7 N) and neutral tilt provides the most even distribution of forces (27.7 N).
This is the first study to investigate force distribution under the baseplate in inferior eccentric glenospheres. Although inferior tilting of the baseplate is recommended for concentric and laterally offset glenospheres, this same recommendation may be detrimental to inferiorly offset glenospheres and warrants further investigation.
假设/背景:对于严重肩袖缺损的患者,反式肩关节置换术的应用频率越来越高。有几种市售的反式肩关节假体,每个假体都有不同的球窝关节选项。本研究的目的是确定:(1)旋转中心与假体中心同心和偏心的球窝关节在基底-骨界面处的力;(2)通过改变基底的倾斜是否可以优化基底-骨的力。
使用经过验证的计算机模型,比较了中心对齐的同心球窝关节与偏心(向下或侧向)6 毫米的球窝关节在 3 种基底倾斜角度(向下 15°、中立或向上 15°)下的情况。模拟了基底、模拟骨、螺钉和肱骨组件,并计算了在手臂进行全范围盂肱关节运动时基底下的力。
对于侧向和中心对齐的球窝关节,向下倾斜提供了最均匀的力分布(基底上、下部分之间的力差异平均值:分别为 11.3 N 和 24.7 N),而向上倾斜提供了最不均匀的力分布(分别为 109.3 N 和 78.7 N)。对于向下偏心的球窝关节,向下倾斜提供了最不均匀的力分布(58.7 N),而中立倾斜提供了最均匀的力分布(27.7 N)。
这是第一项研究在向下偏心球窝关节中调查基底下力分布的研究。虽然向下倾斜基底适用于同心和侧向偏移的球窝关节,但这种相同的建议可能对向下偏移的球窝关节不利,需要进一步研究。