University of Tasmania.
Public Adm. 2010;88(4):928-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01851.x.
This paper draws on the findings from a research project on partnership arrangements between the police and housing departments on three Australian public housing estates to tackle problems associated with illicit drug activity and anti-social behaviour (ASB). The analysis focused on the setting up of the partnerships and the interactions that followed from these institutional arrangements. The assumption that informs the paper is that when studying partnerships there is a need for a more critically framed analysis. The temptation to posit "a successful model" of what partnership entails and then to judge practices in relation to this model is considerable, but it inevitably falls into the trap of constructing a narrative of partnership success or failure in terms of individual agency (that is, the degree of commitment from individuals). The analysis undertaken in this paper has therefore sought to fathom a more complex set of organizational processes. Rather than confine the discussion to issues of success and failure, the study foregrounds the subjective accounts of individuals who work within partnership and the constraints they encounter. The paper therefore makes explicit the cultural tensions within and across agencies, contestation as to the extent of the policy "problem," and the divergent perspectives on the appropriate modes of intervention.
本文借鉴了一项关于警察和住房部门在澳大利亚三个公共住房区建立伙伴关系以解决与非法毒品活动和反社会行为(ASB)相关问题的研究项目的发现。分析重点是伙伴关系的建立以及这些制度安排所带来的互动。本文的基本假设是,在研究伙伴关系时,需要进行更具批判性的分析。假设存在一种“成功模式”,并根据该模式来判断实践,这种诱惑是相当大的,但它不可避免地陷入了以个人机构(即个人的承诺程度)来构建伙伴关系成功或失败的叙述的陷阱。本文所进行的分析因此寻求深入了解更复杂的一系列组织过程。该研究不仅将讨论局限于成功和失败问题,而是将重点放在在伙伴关系中工作的个人的主观描述以及他们遇到的限制上。因此,本文明确了机构内部和机构之间的文化紧张关系、对政策“问题”程度的争议,以及对适当干预模式的不同看法。