Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 28;52(7):4610-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4936.
To characterize optic nerve and retinal changes in a patient with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with an implanted active epiretinal array.
A 74-year-old man with end-stage X-linked RP underwent implantation of an epiretinal array over the macula in the right eye and subsequent stimulation until his death at 5 years and 3 months after implantation. The optic nerves from this study patient, as well as those from two age-matched normal patients and two age-matched RP patients, were morphometrically analyzed against two different sets of criteria and compared. The retina underlying the array in the study patient was also morphometrically analyzed and compared with corresponding regions of the retina in the age-matched RP patients.
Optic nerve total axon counts were significantly lower in the study patient and RP patients than in normal patients. However, there was no significant difference when comparing total axon counts from the optic nerve corresponding to the patient's implanted right eye versus the optic nerves from the RP patients (P = 0.59 and P = 0.61 using the two different criteria). Degenerated axon data quantified damage and did not show increased damage in the optic nerve quadrant that retinotopically corresponded to the site of epiretinal array implantation and stimulation. Except for the tack site, there was no significant difference when comparing the retina underlying the array and the corresponding perimacular regions of two RP patients.
Long-term implantation and electrical stimulation with an epiretinal array did not result in damage that could be appreciated in a morphometric analysis of the optic nerve and retina.
描述一位终末期色素性视网膜炎(RP)患者在植入主动视网膜外节刺激器后的视神经和视网膜变化。
一位 74 岁男性患者,患有 X 连锁终末期 RP,在右眼接受了视网膜外节刺激器的植入,并在植入后 5 年零 3 个月死亡前进行了刺激。对来自该研究患者的视神经,以及来自两名年龄匹配的正常患者和两名年龄匹配的 RP 患者的视神经,使用两套不同的标准进行了形态计量学分析,并进行了比较。对研究患者的视网膜下刺激器进行了形态计量学分析,并与年龄匹配的 RP 患者的相应区域进行了比较。
研究患者和 RP 患者的视神经总轴突计数明显低于正常患者。然而,当比较患者植入右眼对应的视神经与 RP 患者的总轴突计数时,没有显著差异(使用两种不同标准,P=0.59 和 P=0.61)。变性轴突数据量化了损伤,但在与视网膜外节刺激器植入和刺激部位视网膜对应区的视神经象限中没有显示出增加的损伤。除了刺钉部位外,刺激器下的视网膜与两名 RP 患者的相应旁黄斑区之间没有显著差异。
长期植入和电刺激视网膜外节刺激器不会导致视神经和视网膜的形态计量学分析中可察觉的损伤。