Neurocognition of Rhythm in Communication Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):409-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0048-6.
Affective stimuli are increasingly used in emotion research. Typically, stimuli are selected from databases providing affective norms. The validity of these norms is a critical factor with regard to the applicability of the stimuli for emotion research. We therefore probed the validity of the Leipzig Affective Norms for German (LANG) by correlating valence and arousal ratings across different sensory modalities. A sample of 120 words was selected from the LANG database, and auditory recordings of these words were obtained from two professional actors. The auditory stimuli were then rated again for valence and arousal. This cross-modal validation approach yielded very high correlations between auditory and visual ratings (>.95). These data confirm the strong validity of the Leipzig Affective Norms for German and encourage their use in emotion research.
情感刺激在情感研究中越来越多地被使用。通常,刺激是从提供情感规范的数据库中选择的。这些规范的有效性是影响刺激在情感研究中适用性的关键因素。因此,我们通过在不同感觉模态之间关联效价和唤醒评分来探测德语莱比锡情感规范(LANG)的有效性。从 LANG 数据库中选择了 120 个单词的样本,并从两位专业演员那里获得了这些单词的听觉录音。然后,对听觉刺激再次进行效价和唤醒评分。这种跨模态验证方法在听觉和视觉评分之间产生了非常高的相关性(>.95)。这些数据证实了德语莱比锡情感规范的强大有效性,并鼓励在情感研究中使用它们。