Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, 5044 Forbes Tower at Atwood, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Assist Technol. 2010 Winter;22(4):215-22. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2010.518579.
Wheeled mobility and seating assessments for individuals with mobility impairments living in rural or distant locations are problematic due to the lack of expertise and available resources. The objective of this study was to measure satisfaction based on one's evaluation and prescription as well as comfort level when being evaluated by telerehabilitation (TR). Patient satisfaction data from real-time interactive TR clinical consultations between an expert practitioner located at least 125 miles away and four remote wheelchair clinics set up by the research team were collected and evaluated. The results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between participants' pre- and postevaluation scores, t(39) = -13.92, p < .05, as well as pre- and postprescription scores, t(39) = -13.15, p < .05. In addition, all mean scores were significantly higher than the scale midpoint of3.5 on a TR survey. The study's findings are consistent with those of previous telemedicine satisfaction studies. Overall, the results indicate a high level of patient satisfaction using TR.
由于缺乏专业知识和可用资源,对于居住在农村或偏远地区的行动不便者,轮式移动和座椅评估存在问题。本研究的目的是通过远程康复(TR)评估时的评估和处方以及舒适度来衡量满意度。从位于至少 125 英里以外的专家从业者与研究团队设立的四个远程轮椅诊所之间的实时互动 TR 临床咨询中收集并评估了患者满意度数据。结果表明,参与者在评估前后的得分存在统计学上的显著差异,t(39) = -13.92,p <.05,以及处方前后的得分,t(39) = -13.15,p <.05。此外,所有平均分都明显高于 TR 调查的 3.5 分刻度中点。该研究的结果与之前的远程医疗满意度研究一致。总体而言,结果表明使用 TR 的患者满意度很高。