National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Jul;119(7):1023-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002725. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
The findings of prior studies of air pollution effects on adverse birth outcomes are difficult to synthesize because of differences in study design.
The International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes was formed to understand how differences in research methods contribute to variations in findings. We initiated a feasibility study to a) assess the ability of geographically diverse research groups to analyze their data sets using a common protocol and b) perform location-specific analyses of air pollution effects on birth weight using a standardized statistical approach.
Fourteen research groups from nine countries participated. We developed a protocol to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the association between particulate matter ≤ 10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM₁₀) and low birth weight (LBW) among term births, adjusted first for socioeconomic status (SES) and second for additional location-specific variables.
Among locations with data for the PM₁₀ analysis, ORs estimating the relative risk of term LBW associated with a 10-μg/m³ increase in average PM₁₀ concentration during pregnancy, adjusted for SES, ranged from 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-1.35] for the Netherlands to 1.15 (95% CI, 0.61-2.18) for Vancouver, with six research groups reporting statistically significant adverse associations. We found evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity in estimated effects among locations.
Variability in PM₁₀-LBW relationships among study locations remained despite use of a common statistical approach. A more detailed meta-analysis and use of more complex protocols for future analysis may uncover reasons for heterogeneity across locations. However, our findings confirm the potential for a diverse group of researchers to analyze their data in a standardized way to improve understanding of air pollution effects on birth outcomes.
先前关于空气污染对不良出生结局影响的研究结果难以综合,原因在于研究设计存在差异。
国际空气污染与妊娠结局合作研究组织成立的目的是了解研究方法的差异如何导致研究结果的变化。我们开展了一项可行性研究,以评估:a)地理位置不同的研究小组是否有能力使用共同方案分析其数据集;b)使用标准化统计方法对特定地点空气污染对出生体重的影响进行分析。
来自 9 个国家的 14 个研究小组参与了该研究。我们制定了一个方案,以估计在足月分娩中,空气动力学直径≤10μm 的颗粒物(PM₁₀)与低出生体重(LBW)之间的关联的比值比(OR),首先针对社会经济状况(SES)进行调整,其次针对特定地点的其他变量进行调整。
在具有 PM₁₀ 分析数据的地点中,调整 SES 后,估计妊娠期间 PM₁₀ 浓度每增加 10μg/m³,与足月 LBW 相关的相对风险的 OR 范围为荷兰的 0.63(95%置信区间[CI],0.30-1.35)至温哥华的 1.15(95% CI,0.61-2.18),有 6 个研究小组报告了具有统计学意义的不良关联。我们发现地点间估计效果存在统计学显著的异质性。
尽管使用了共同的统计方法,但研究地点之间的 PM₁₀-LBW 关系仍然存在差异。未来分析时,更详细的荟萃分析和更复杂的方案使用可能会揭示地点间异质性的原因。然而,我们的研究结果证实,一群多样化的研究人员可以以标准化的方式分析他们的数据,以提高对空气污染对出生结局影响的理解。