Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 May;20(5):514-22. doi: 10.1002/pds.2116. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
To determine the association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity among elderly persons.
This was a prospective cohort study of 294 survivors from the population-based Geriatric Multidisciplinary Strategy for the Good Care of the Elderly (GeMS) Study, with yearly follow-ups during 2004 to 2007. Participants were the citizens of Kuopio, Finland, aged 75 years and older at baseline. Polypharmacy status was categorized as non-polypharmacy (0-5 drugs), polypharmacy (6-9 drugs) and excessive polypharmacy (10+ drugs). A linear mixed model approach was used for analysis the impact of polypharmacy on short form of mini nutritional assessment (MNA-SF), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and mini-mental status examination (MMSE) scores.
Excessive polypharmacy was associated with declined nutritional status (p = 0.001), functional ability (p < 0.001) and cognitive capacity (p < 0.001) when compared to non-polypharmacy group. Age, institutional living, poor self-reported health and time of measuring were also associated with the three outcome measures. In the excessive polypharmacy group, the proportion of malnourished or at risk of it increased from 31% to 50%, having difficulties in daily tasks from 48% to 74% and impaired cognition from 36% to 54% during the follow-up. The mixed model analysis revealed that polypharmacy status was not able to predict the progress of MNA-SF, IADL and MMSE scores over a three-year time.
Excessive polypharmacy is associated with decline in nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity in elderly persons. However, the changes in nutrition, physical functionality and cognition over a three-year period cannot be predicted by polypharmacy status.
确定老年人药物使用种类与营养状况、功能能力和认知能力的关系。
这是一项对基于人群的老年综合多学科策略良好护理研究(GeMS)中 294 名幸存者进行的前瞻性队列研究,在 2004 年至 2007 年期间每年进行随访。参与者为芬兰库奥皮奥市的公民,年龄在基线时均为 75 岁及以上。药物使用种类分为非药物治疗(0-5 种药物)、药物治疗(6-9 种药物)和过度药物治疗(10+种药物)。采用线性混合模型方法分析药物使用种类对简易营养评估量表(MNA-SF)、工具性日常生活活动(IADL)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评分的影响。
与非药物治疗组相比,过度药物治疗与营养状况下降(p=0.001)、功能能力下降(p<0.001)和认知能力下降(p<0.001)相关。年龄、机构居住、自我报告健康状况差和测量时间也与这三个结果测量指标相关。在过度药物治疗组中,在随访期间,营养不良或有风险的人数比例从 31%增加到 50%,日常任务困难的人数比例从 48%增加到 74%,认知受损的人数比例从 36%增加到 54%。混合模型分析表明,在三年内,药物使用种类并不能预测 MNA-SF、IADL 和 MMSE 评分的进展。
过度药物治疗与老年人营养状况、功能能力和认知能力下降有关。然而,营养、身体功能和认知在三年内的变化不能用药物使用种类来预测。