Recovery of pacemakers and defibrillators for analysis and device advance directives: electrophysiologists' perspectives.

BACKGROUND

Following high-profile device failures, the Heart Rhythm Society emphasized the need for postmarketing surveillance by recommending that physicians return all explanted devices to the manufacturer for analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a national survey of electrophysiologists (EPs) regarding recovery for analysis of explanted pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (devices), and attitudes toward device-specific advance directives to facilitate return of devices. Online survey invitations were sent in four waves from December 2008 to June 2009 to 300 e-mail addresses from the Heart Rhythm Society member database.

RESULTS

From 250 invitations, there were 95 responses (38%). Demographics included average age 50 years (range, 31-87); 95% male; 81% Caucasian. Only 23% reported returning all explanted devices to the manufacturers. Of all the respondents, 32% discarded >10 devices/year as medical waste, 42% stored devices in a box in the electrophysiology lab, and 10% donated at least 1 device/year to charity for reuse overseas. Sixty-seven percent felt that it would not be helpful to have an advance directive specifying what the patient would want done with their device postmortem.

CONCLUSIONS

Few EPs return all explanted devices or send interrogation reports to the manufacturers, though nearly all said it was easy to do so. A majority either dispose of explanted devices as medical waste or store them in laboratories or offices, and a small percentage donate for reuse in underserved nations or to veterinary hospitals. This study suggests a need for initiatives such as educational campaigns to increase the retrieval and return of devices, either for analysis or reuse.