Issel L Michele, Forrestal Sarah G, Slaughter Jaime, Wiencrot Anna, Handler Arden
School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Community Health Sciences Division, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;40(2):157-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01219.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
To determine the effectiveness of prenatal home visiting for improving prenatal care utilization and preventing preterm birth and low birth weight.
Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Social Work Abstract databases were searched for articles that examined prenatal home-visiting and prenatal care utilization or neonatal outcomes, with additional ascendancy and descendancy searches. Listservs were also used to identify unpublished evaluations.
Quantitative studies meeting the following criteria were included in the analyses: published between 1985 and 2009, published in English, reported providing prenatal home visiting, and reported on prenatal care utilization or a neonatal outcome.
Study characteristics and findings related to prenatal care utilization, gestational age, and birth weight were abstracted independently by at least two authors. Study quality was assessed across five domains.
The search yielded 28 studies comparing outcomes for women who did and did not receive prenatal home visiting, with 14 (59%) using an RCT design. Five (17%) studies reporting on prenatal care utilization found a statistically significant improvement in use of prenatal care for women with home visiting. Of 24 studies reporting an effect on birth outcomes, five (21%) found a significant positive effect on gestational age, and seven of 17 (41%) found a significant positive effect on birth weight.
More evidence suggests that prenatal home visiting may improve the use of prenatal care, whereas less evidence exists that it improves neonatal birth weight or gestational age. These findings have implications for implementing Title II of the Affordable Care Act.
确定产前家访在提高产前护理利用率以及预防早产和低出生体重方面的有效性。
检索了医学文献数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引数据库(Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和社会工作摘要数据库,以查找有关产前家访及产前护理利用率或新生儿结局的文章,并进行了额外的追溯检索。还利用邮件列表来识别未发表的评估报告。
符合以下标准的定量研究纳入分析:发表于1985年至2009年之间、英文发表、报告提供了产前家访,并且报告了产前护理利用率或新生儿结局。
至少两名作者独立提取与产前护理利用率、孕周和出生体重相关的研究特征及结果。从五个领域评估研究质量。
检索得到28项比较接受和未接受产前家访女性结局的研究,其中14项(59%)采用随机对照试验设计。五项(17%)报告产前护理利用率的研究发现,接受家访的女性在产前护理使用方面有统计学上的显著改善。在24项报告对出生结局有影响的研究中,五项(21%)发现对孕周有显著的积极影响,17项中的七项(41%)发现对出生体重有显著的积极影响。
更多证据表明产前家访可能会提高产前护理的利用率,而关于其改善新生儿出生体重或孕周的证据较少。这些发现对实施《平价医疗法案》第二章有启示意义。