Department of Microbiology, Porto School of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Microbiology Laboratory of Clinical Pathology Department, Hospital São João, Porto, Portugal.
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Jun;60(Pt 6):756-760. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.024075-0. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
The VITEK 2 automated system (bioMérieux) is one of the most widely used instruments in clinical microbiology laboratories for the identification and evaluation of the susceptibility profiles of bacteria including the detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) produced by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca. Currently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends the use of ESBL confirmatory tests in addition to standard susceptibility testing. In order to evaluate the accuracy of VITEK 2-positive results regarding clinical isolates of E. coli (n = 110) and K. pneumoniae (n = 72), four additional ESBL detection systems were compared: the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (BD Diagnostic Systems) and the MicroScan WalkAway-96 System (Dade Behring), and two manual systems as confirmatory tests, the Etest (AB Biodisk) and double disc diffusion (DDS) test. Epidemiological data regarding the tested strains were also collected and their susceptibility phenotypes were determined. The four methods resulted in concordant results for 126 of the 182 strains. However, the different tests displayed distinct results: the VITEK 2 system was in disagreement in 23.9 % of cases with DDS, in 15.3 % with Etest, in 23 % with the MicroScan WalkAway-96 System and in 23.6 % with the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System. Epidemiological data indicated that the majority of ESBL-positive E. coli strains were isolated from patients admitted to internal medicine wards (72.7 %), whilst K. pneumoniae ESBL-positive isolates were equally distributed between internal medicine wards (45.8 %) and intensive care units (45.8 %). Most of these strains were isolated from urine. In contrast to ESBL-negative isolates, the ESBL-positive strains displayed multiple drug resistance, namely to quinolones, aminoglycosides and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. No significant resistance to carbapenems was detected. Overall, this study demonstrates the need for a confirmatory test following positive ESBL detection with the VITEK 2 system (panel AST-037), which appears to yield a large number of false-positive results.
VITEK 2 自动化系统(生物梅里埃)是临床微生物学实验室中最广泛使用的仪器之一,用于鉴定和评估细菌的药敏谱,包括检测大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和产酸克雷伯菌产生的超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)。目前,临床和实验室标准协会建议除了标准药敏试验外,还使用 ESBL 确证试验。为了评估 VITEK 2 阳性结果对临床分离的大肠埃希菌(n=110)和肺炎克雷伯菌(n=72)的准确性,比较了四种额外的 ESBL 检测系统:Phoenix 自动化微生物系统(BD 诊断系统)和 MicroScan WalkAway-96 系统(德灵),以及两种作为确证试验的手动系统,Etest(AB 生物科学)和双碟扩散(DDS)试验。还收集了测试菌株的流行病学数据,并确定了它们的药敏表型。这四种方法对 182 株中的 126 株结果一致。然而,不同的试验显示出不同的结果:VITEK 2 系统与 DDS 不一致的比例为 23.9%,与 Etest 不一致的比例为 15.3%,与 MicroScan WalkAway-96 系统不一致的比例为 23%,与 Phoenix 自动化微生物系统不一致的比例为 23.6%。流行病学数据表明,大多数 ESBL 阳性大肠埃希菌菌株是从内科病房(72.7%)入院的患者中分离出来的,而肺炎克雷伯菌 ESBL 阳性分离株在内科病房(45.8%)和重症监护病房(45.8%)之间分布均匀。这些菌株大多从尿液中分离出来。与 ESBL 阴性分离株相比,ESBL 阳性菌株显示出对多种药物的耐药性,即对喹诺酮类、氨基糖苷类和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑。未检测到对碳青霉烯类药物的显著耐药性。总的来说,这项研究表明,需要对 VITEK 2 系统(AST-037 检测板)检测到的 ESBL 阳性结果进行确证试验,因为该系统似乎产生了大量的假阳性结果。