Suppr超能文献

比较逆转录酶聚合酶链反应、逆转录环介导等温扩增和基于培养的检测方法,用于从猪肉加工环境中检测沙门氏菌。

Comparison of reverse transcriptase PCR, reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification, and culture-based assays for Salmonella detection from pork processing environments.

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Technology, The University of Tennessee, 2605 River Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4591, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2011 Feb;74(2):294-301. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-306.

Abstract

Novel rapid Salmonella detection assays without the need for sophisticated equipment or labor remain in high demand. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays, though rapid and sensitive, require expensive thermocyclers, while a novel RT loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) method requires only a simple water bath. Our objective was to compare the detection sensitivity of Salmonella Typhimurium from the pork processing environment by RT-LAMP, RT-PCR, and culture-based assays. Carcass and surface swabs and carcass rinses were obtained from a local processing plant. Autoclaved carcass rinses (500 ml) were spiked with Salmonella Typhimurium and filtered. Filters were placed in stomacher bags containing tetrathionate broth (TTB) and analyzed with or without 10-h enrichment at 37 °C. Natural swabs were stomached with buffered peptone water, and natural carcass rinses were filtered, preenriched, and further enriched in TTB. Serially-diluted enriched samples were enumerated by spread plating on xylose lysine Tergitol 4 agar. RNA was extracted from 5 ml of enriched TTB with TRIzol. RT-LAMP assay using previously described invA primers was conducted at 62 °C for 90 min in a water bath with visual detection and by gel electrophoresis. SYBR Green I-based-real-time RT-PCR was carried out with invA primers followed by melt temperature analysis. The results of RT-LAMP detection for spiked carcass rinses were comparable to those of RT-PCR and cultural plating, with detection limits of 1 log CFU/ml, although they were obtained significantly faster, within 24 h including preenrichment and enrichment. RT-LAMP showed 4 of 12 rinse samples positive, while RT-PCR showed 1 of 12 rinse samples positive. For swabs, 6 of 27 samples positive by RT-LAMP and 5 of 27 by RT-PCR were obtained. This 1-day RT-LAMP assay shows promise for routine Salmonella screening by the pork industry.

摘要

新型快速沙门氏菌检测方法,无需复杂设备或劳动力,仍有很高的需求。实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测虽然快速灵敏,但需要昂贵的热循环仪,而新型 RT 环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP)方法仅需简单的水浴。我们的目的是比较 RT-LAMP、RT-PCR 和基于培养的方法检测猪肉加工环境中沙门氏菌 Typhimurium 的检测灵敏度。从当地加工厂采集胴体和表面拭子和胴体冲洗液。将灭菌的胴体冲洗液(500ml)与沙门氏菌 Typhimurium 混合并过滤。将过滤器放入含有四硫代硫酸盐肉汤(TTB)的 Stomacher 袋中,并在 37°C 下进行或不进行 10 小时富集分析。天然拭子用缓冲蛋白胨水冲洗,天然胴体冲洗液过滤,预富集后进一步在 TTB 中富集。通过在木糖赖氨酸 Tergitol 4 琼脂上进行涂布平板对连续稀释的富集样品进行计数。用 TRIzol 从 5ml 富集的 TTB 中提取 RNA。使用先前描述的 invA 引物的 RT-LAMP 检测在 62°C 的水浴中进行 90 分钟,通过目视检测和凝胶电泳进行。使用 invA 引物进行 SYBR Green I 实时 RT-PCR,然后进行熔解温度分析。对于加标冲洗液,RT-LAMP 检测结果与 RT-PCR 和培养平板检测结果相当,检测限为 1logCFU/ml,尽管它们获得的速度明显更快,在包括预富集和富集在内的 24 小时内即可获得。RT-LAMP 显示 4 份冲洗液样本为阳性,而 RT-PCR 显示 12 份冲洗液样本中有 1 份为阳性。对于拭子,RT-LAMP 获得 27 份样本中的 6 份阳性,RT-PCR 获得 27 份样本中的 5 份阳性。这种为期 1 天的 RT-LAMP 检测方法有望成为猪肉行业常规沙门氏菌筛查的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验