Service de Néphrologie Réanimation Médicale, Pole REUNNIRH, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1301-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182120190.
The aim of the study was to assess whether an isolated positive catheter culture is predictive of a subsequent bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients.
Retrospective clinical study between 2000 and 2007.
Intensive care unit of a university hospital.
All arterial, central venous, and dialysis catheters yielding selected pathogenic microorganisms from isolated positive catheter cultures. Positive catheter culture was defined by a catheter tip culture performed with the Brun-Buisson technique yielding ≥103 colony-forming units/mL; isolated positive catheter culture by a positive catheter culture without concomitant bloodstream infection due to the microorganism of the positive catheter culture evidenced within 48 hrs before or after catheter removal; and subsequent bloodstream infection by a bloodstream infection developing between 48 hrs and 30 days after catheter removal and due to a selected pathogenic microorganism of an isolated positive catheter culture. Active antibiotic therapy was active if at least one of the antibiotics administered was effective against the selected pathogenic microorganism of the positive catheter culture.
None.
The end point of the study was the ratio of the number of subsequent bloodstream infections to that of selected pathogenic microorganisms isolated from positive catheter culture 30 days after catheter removal. A total of 138 isolated positive catheter cultures for 149 selected pathogenic micro-organisms was included in the study. Only two cases (1.3%) of subsequent bloodstream infection were evidenced, one resulting from Escherichia coli and the other from Staphylococcus epidermidis. The incidence of subsequent bloodstream infection did not differ with regard to the presence or absence of active antibiotics at catheter removal: zero of 23 vs. two of 121 (p = 1), respectively.
Our results suggest that the risk of subsequent bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients when the Brun-Buisson technique is used to define isolated positive catheter culture is low.
本研究旨在评估在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,单纯导管培养阳性是否可预测随后发生血流感染。
2000 年至 2007 年的回顾性临床研究。
大学医院的 ICU。
所有从单纯导管培养阳性中分离出特定病原菌的动脉、中心静脉和透析导管。导管尖端培养采用 Brun-Buisson 技术进行,阳性导管培养定义为导管尖端培养物中≥103 菌落形成单位/ml;单纯导管培养阳性定义为在导管去除前 48 小时内或之后,导管培养阳性而无阳性导管培养物中分离出的微生物引起的血流感染;随后发生的血流感染定义为导管去除后 48 小时至 30 天内发生的血流感染,且引起血流感染的微生物为阳性导管培养物中分离出的特定病原菌。如果至少一种给予的抗生素对阳性导管培养物中分离出的特定病原菌有效,则认为主动抗生素治疗是有效的。
无。
研究的终点为导管去除后 30 天内,随后发生血流感染的数量与从阳性导管培养物中分离出的特定病原菌数量的比值。共有 149 种选定的病原菌从 138 例阳性导管培养物中分离出来,纳入本研究。仅发现 2 例(1.3%)随后发生血流感染,分别为大肠埃希菌和表皮葡萄球菌引起。在导管去除时是否使用抗生素与随后发生血流感染的发生率无差异:23 例中无 1 例,121 例中有 2 例(p=1)。
本研究结果表明,在 ICU 患者中使用 Brun-Buisson 技术定义单纯导管培养阳性时,发生随后血流感染的风险较低。