Millward Ian R, Kirberger Robert M, Thompson Peter N
Department of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011 May-Jun;52(3):295-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01790.x. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Thoracic duct computed tomography (CT) lymphangiograms were performed on seven clinically normal dogs. The appearance of the thoracic duct system was compared following administration of contrast medium through a mesenteric lymphatic vessel vs. ultrasound guided percutaneous injection into a popliteal lymph node using helical and sequential CT acquisition modes. The number of visible thoracic duct branches and the largest thoracic duct branch cross-sectional area and mean Hounsfield units (HU) were determined from thoracic vertebra 9 to lumbar vertebra 1. Procedural time and patient discomfort were also assessed. Popliteal administration produced a successful thoracic duct lymphangiogram in eight of 11 dogs (73%) after two attempts, while mesenteric administration was successful in eight of 10 dogs (80%) after a single attempt. Popliteal lymphography required 46% of the time and was associated with less patient discomfort than mesenteric lymphangiography. The number of thoracic duct branches seen was not significantly different for either administration technique (P=0.256) or CT acquisition mode (P=0.417). However, the cross-sectional area and mean HU of the largest thoracic duct branch were greater with mesenteric administration (P<0.001), and helical image acquisition (P<0.001). The thoracic duct branch number, size, and location were highly variable between dogs. Percutaneous popliteal lymphography appears to be an acceptable alternative to mesenteric lymphangiography for the detection of thoracic duct branches in the dog when using either helical or sequential CT acquisition modes.
对7只临床健康的犬进行了胸导管计算机断层扫描(CT)淋巴管造影。通过肠系膜淋巴管注入造影剂与超声引导下经皮注射到腘淋巴结后,使用螺旋CT和序列CT采集模式比较胸导管系统的表现。从第9胸椎至第1腰椎确定可见的胸导管分支数量、最大胸导管分支横截面积和平均亨氏单位(HU)。还评估了操作时间和动物不适情况。经两次尝试后,腘部给药在11只犬中的8只(73%)成功完成胸导管淋巴管造影,而肠系膜给药在单次尝试后10只犬中的8只(80%)成功。腘部淋巴造影所需时间为肠系膜淋巴造影的46%,且动物不适较少。两种给药技术(P=0.256)或CT采集模式(P=0.417)下可见的胸导管分支数量无显著差异。然而,肠系膜给药(P<0.001)和螺旋图像采集(P<0.001)时,最大胸导管分支的横截面积和平均HU更大。犬之间胸导管分支数量、大小和位置差异很大。当使用螺旋或序列CT采集模式时,经皮腘部淋巴造影似乎是检测犬胸导管分支的肠系膜淋巴造影的可接受替代方法。