School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;1(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00006.x.
The potentially debilitating effect of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has created much interest in early intervention strategies that can reduce PTSD. This review critiques the evidence for psychological debriefing approaches and alternate early intervention strategies.
The review critiques the randomized controlled trials of psychological debriefing, and early provision of cognitive behavior therapy. The latter approach involves therapy attention on acutely traumatized individuals who are high risk for PTSD development, and particularly in people with acute stress disorder (ASD).
Psychological debriefing does not prevent PTSD. Cognitive behaviour therapy strategies have proven efficacy in reducing subsequent PTSD in ASD populations.
Despite the promising evidence for early provision of CBT, many people do not benefit from CBT. This review concludes with consideration of major challenges facing early intervention approaches in the context of terrorist attacks and mass disasters.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)可能会使人致残,这引起了人们对早期干预策略的极大兴趣,这些策略可以减少 PTSD 的发生。本综述评价了心理疏导方法和其他早期干预策略的证据。
本综述评价了心理疏导的随机对照试验,以及早期提供认知行为疗法的试验。后一种方法是对有 PTSD 发展高风险的急性创伤个体,特别是对急性应激障碍(ASD)患者,给予关注。
心理疏导并不能预防 PTSD。认知行为疗法策略已被证明在减少 ASD 人群中随后发生 PTSD 方面具有疗效。
尽管早期提供 CBT 的证据很有前景,但许多人并没有从 CBT 中受益。本综述最后考虑了在恐怖袭击和大规模灾害背景下,早期干预方法所面临的主要挑战。