Suppr超能文献

PAM与BLOSUM氨基酸替换矩阵的比较。

Comparison of the PAM and BLOSUM Amino Acid Substitution Matrices.

作者信息

Mount David W

出版信息

CSH Protoc. 2008 Jun 1;2008:pdb.ip59. doi: 10.1101/pdb.ip59.

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONThe choice of a scoring system including scores for matches, mismatches, substitutions, insertions, and deletions influences the alignment of both DNA and protein sequences. To score matches and mismatches in alignments of proteins, it is necessary to know how often one amino acid is substituted for another in related proteins. Percent accepted mutation (PAM) matrices list the likelihood of change from one amino acid to another in homologous protein sequences during evolution and thus are focused on tracking the evolutionary origins of proteins. In contrast, the blocks amino acid substitution matrices (BLOSUM) are based on scoring substitutions found over a range of evolutionary periods. There are important differences in the ways that the PAM and BLOSUM scoring matrices were derived. These differences, which are discussed in this article, should be appreciated when interpreting the results of protein sequence alignments obtained with these matrices.

摘要

引言

包括匹配、错配、替换、插入和缺失得分的评分系统的选择会影响DNA和蛋白质序列的比对。为了对蛋白质比对中的匹配和错配进行评分,有必要了解在相关蛋白质中一种氨基酸被另一种氨基酸取代的频率。百分接受突变(PAM)矩阵列出了进化过程中同源蛋白质序列中一种氨基酸转变为另一种氨基酸的可能性,因此专注于追踪蛋白质的进化起源。相比之下,模块氨基酸替换矩阵(BLOSUM)基于在一系列进化时期发现的替换得分。PAM和BLOSUM评分矩阵的推导方式存在重要差异。本文将讨论这些差异,在解释使用这些矩阵获得的蛋白质序列比对结果时应予以重视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验