Institut International de Paléoprimatologie, Paléontologie Humaine: Evolution et Paléoenvironnements (iPHEP), CNRS/Université de Poitiers, 86022 Poitiers, France.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Jun;145(2):231-46. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21488. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
Modern humans are characterized by their large, complex, and specialized brain. Human brain evolution can be addressed through direct evidence provided by fossil hominid endocasts (i.e. paleoneurology), or through indirect evidence of extant species comparative neurology. Here we use the second approach, providing an extant comparative framework for hominid paleoneurological studies. We explore endocranial size and shape differences among great apes and humans, as well as between sexes. We virtually extracted 72 endocasts, sampling all extant great ape species and modern humans, and digitized 37 landmarks on each for 3D generalized Procrustes analysis. All species can be differentiated by their endocranial shape. Among great apes, endocranial shapes vary from short (orangutans) to long (gorillas), perhaps in relation to different facial orientations. Endocranial shape differences among African apes are partly allometric. Major endocranial traits distinguishing humans from great apes are endocranial globularity, reflecting neurological reorganization, and features linked to structural responses to posture and bipedal locomotion. Human endocasts are also characterized by posterior location of foramina rotunda relative to optic canals, which could be correlated to lesser subnasal prognathism compared to living great apes. Species with larger brains (gorillas and humans) display greater sexual dimorphism in endocranial size, while sexual dimorphism in endocranial shape is restricted to gorillas, differences between males and females being at least partly due to allometry. Our study of endocranial variations in extant great apes and humans provides a new comparative dataset for studies of fossil hominid endocasts.
现代人的特征是大脑大、复杂且专业化。人类大脑的进化可以通过化石人属内颅(即古神经学)提供的直接证据来研究,也可以通过现存物种比较神经学的间接证据来研究。在这里,我们采用第二种方法,为古人类神经学研究提供了现存的比较框架。我们探索了类人猿和人类的内颅大小和形状差异,以及性别之间的差异。我们通过虚拟提取 72 个内颅样本,对所有现存的大型猿类物种和现代人类进行了采样,并对每个样本的 37 个标志点进行了数字化处理,以便进行 3D 广义 Procrustes 分析。所有物种都可以通过内颅形状来区分。在大型猿类中,内颅形状从短(猩猩)到长(大猩猩)不等,这可能与不同的面部朝向有关。非洲猿类之间的内颅形状差异部分是由异速生长引起的。将人类与大型猿类区分开来的主要内颅特征是内颅的球形,反映了神经系统的重新组织,以及与姿势和双足运动结构响应相关的特征。人类的内颅还具有相对于视神经管后移的圆窗位置,这可能与相对于现存的大型猿类而言,鼻骨下突的程度较小有关。大脑较大的物种(大猩猩和人类)在内颅大小上表现出更大的性别二态性,而内颅形状的性别二态性仅限于大猩猩,雄性和雌性之间的差异至少部分是由异速生长引起的。我们对现存大型猿类和人类的内颅变异的研究为化石人属内颅的研究提供了一个新的比较数据集。