Suppr超能文献

开发和测试健康素养通用预防工具包。

Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit.

机构信息

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2011 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002.

Abstract

The health literacy demands of the healthcare system often exceed the health literacy skills of Americans. This article reviews the development of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions (HLUP) Toolkit, commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and designed to help primary care practices structure the delivery of care as if every patient may have limited health literacy. The development of the toolkit spanned 2 years and consisted of 3 major tasks: (1) developing individual tools (modules explaining how to use or implement a strategy to minimize the effects of low health literacy), using existing health literacy resources when possible, (2) testing individual tools in clinical practice and assembling them into a prototype toolkit, and (3) testing the prototype toolkit in clinical practice. Testing revealed that practices will use tools that are concise and actionable and are not perceived as being resource intensive. Conducting practice self-assessments and generating enthusiasm among staff were key elements for successful implementation. Implementing practice changes required more time than anticipated and some knowledge of quality improvement techniques. In sum, the HLUP Toolkit holds promise as a means of improving primary care for people with limited health literacy, but further testing is needed.

摘要

医疗体系的健康素养要求常常超出美国人的健康素养技能。本文回顾了卫生保健研究和质量机构委托开发的健康素养通用预防措施(HLUP)工具包的发展情况,该工具包旨在帮助初级保健实践将护理交付结构化,就好像每个患者的健康素养可能都有限。工具包的开发历时 2 年,由 3 项主要任务组成:(1)开发单个工具(模块,解释如何使用或实施策略以最大程度降低低健康素养的影响),尽可能利用现有的健康素养资源;(2)在临床实践中测试单个工具,并将它们组装成原型工具包;(3)在临床实践中测试原型工具包。测试表明,实践将使用简洁和可操作的工具,并且不会被认为是资源密集型的。进行实践自我评估并在员工中激发热情是成功实施的关键要素。实施实践变革所需的时间比预期的要长,并且需要一些质量改进技术方面的知识。总的来说,HLUP 工具包有望成为改善具有有限健康素养的人群的初级保健的一种手段,但还需要进一步测试。

相似文献

1
Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit.
Nurs Outlook. 2011 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002.
2
Improving the Effectiveness of Medication Review: Guidance from the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):18-23. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150163.
3
Demonstration of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit: Lessons for Quality Improvement.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2016 Jul-Sep;39(3):199-208. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000102.
4
Using the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to Improve the Quality of Patient Materials.
J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):69-76. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1081997.
5
Understanding and Advancing Organizational Health Literacy Within a Public Health Setting.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Feb 11;5(1):e35-e48. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210114-01.
6
Improving Health Literacy at the Organizational Level.
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2020 Mar 1;13(1):79-83. doi: 10.1891/2380-9418.JDNP-D-19-00028. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Implementation and Evaluation of a Laboratory Safety Process Improvement Toolkit.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):136-145. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180109.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

4
Bridging gender health gaps through digital health interventions: integrating digital health literacy.
Womens Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;31(2):88-93. doi: 10.4069/whn.2025.04.04. Epub 2025 May 20.
6
Communicate to Care: Implementing Health Literacy in a Pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat Clinic.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jul;8(3):e166-e174. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240819-02. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
7
Reflections on Dr. Rima Rudd's Significance to Health Literacy in the Shadow of Health Equity.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jul;8(3):e159-e161. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240814-02. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
8
Nursing Students' Health Literacy and Strategies to Foster Patients' Health Literacy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;21(8):1048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081048.
10
Bladder Cancer Health Literacy: Assessing Readability of Online Patient Education Materials.
Bladder Cancer. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):91-98. doi: 10.3233/BLC-200387. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence does not support clinical screening of literacy.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):100-2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0447-2. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
2
Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 23;167(14):1503-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.14.1503.
3
Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):806-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00539.x.
4
Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1228-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x.
5
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
6
Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills.
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):1039-41. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210000-00021.
7
Information systems can prevent errors and improve quality.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;8(4):398-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080398.
8
Developing and testing changes in delivery of care.
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15;128(8):651-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验