Suppr超能文献

比利时弗兰德斯地区蛋鸡生产企业引入替代型蛋鸡饲养系统的调查报告。

Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium.

机构信息

Animal Husbandry and Welfare, Animal Sciences Unit, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2011 Apr;90(4):941-50. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01122.

Abstract

In the context of the European Union ban on battery cages by 2012, a survey was conducted among Flemish egg producers (60% response rate, 140 completed questionnaires) about the introduction and opinion of alternative housing systems. Belgium appears to be among the countries in the European Union that are slower to adopt alternative housing. Belgium's egg industry is thus likely to undergo drastic changes to comply with the 2012 deadline. As of 2010, the battery cage was the dominant housing system (56% housing units, 67% hens), followed by floor housing (33% housing units, 15% hens) and aviary (10% housing units, 15% hens), whereas colony cages and furnished cages were extremely rare. Future- and market-oriented production was the most important reason for choosing a certain type of alternative system, although the importance of hen performance and amount of labor seemed to increase. A quarter of the producers with battery cages had detailed plans to convert to an alternative system (most planned to install aviaries, followed by colony cages, furnished cages, and floor housing) by 2012. Many older farmers indicated that they would stop farming, whereas others found it more profitable to delay the conversion as long as possible. Apart from hen welfare, producers expressed a negative opinion (relative to battery cages) about noncage systems and, to a lesser extent, furnished cages. However, users of alternative systems reported being quite satisfied, except for the amount of labor and hen health. The housing system had several effects on user satisfaction: positive effect of flock size, negative effect of experience with battery cages, and negative effect of outdoor area on hen health. Although not all opinions were supported by evidence, such surveys provide feedback about the success of alternative systems in practice. This information is valuable to further improve these systems and to producers who have yet to convert. Moreover, producer attitude may determine the extent to which legally imposed changes in husbandry environment result in the desired improvement of hen welfare in practice.

摘要

在欧盟 2012 年禁止使用笼养鸡蛋的背景下,对佛兰芒鸡蛋生产者(60%的回应率,140 份完整的问卷)进行了一项关于替代住房系统的引入和意见的调查。比利时似乎是欧盟中较晚采用替代住房的国家之一。因此,比利时的蛋鸡产业很可能会发生巨大变化,以遵守 2012 年的最后期限。截至 2010 年,笼养是占主导地位的饲养系统(56%的鸡舍,67%的母鸡),其次是地板饲养(33%的鸡舍,15%的母鸡)和禽类饲养(10%的鸡舍,15%的母鸡),而鸡笼和带家具的鸡笼则极为罕见。面向未来和市场的生产是选择某种替代系统的最重要原因,尽管母鸡性能和劳动力数量的重要性似乎有所增加。四分之一的有笼养鸡的生产者有详细的计划在 2012 年前转换为替代系统(大多数计划安装禽类饲养场,其次是鸡笼、带家具的鸡笼和地板饲养)。许多年老的农民表示他们将停止养殖,而其他人则发现尽可能长时间地推迟转换更有利可图。除了母鸡福利,生产者对非笼养系统(相对于笼养系统)和在较小程度上对带家具的鸡笼表示了负面看法。然而,替代系统的使用者报告说除了劳动力和母鸡健康外,他们对系统非常满意。饲养系统对用户满意度有以下影响:鸡群规模有积极影响,使用笼养经验有消极影响,户外面积对母鸡健康有消极影响。尽管并非所有意见都有证据支持,但此类调查提供了替代系统在实践中的成功反馈。这些信息对于进一步改进这些系统和尚未转换的生产者非常有价值。此外,生产者的态度可能决定法律强制改变饲养环境在实践中对母鸡福利的预期改善程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验