Suppr超能文献

5-氨基水杨酸类药物治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of 5-aminosalicylates in ulcerative colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;106(4):601-16. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.67. Epub 2011 Mar 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acids (5-ASAs) in ulcerative colitis (UC) has been studied previously in meta-analyses. However, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published recently, and no previous meta-analysis has studied the effect of 5-ASA dosage used.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched (through December 2010). Eligible trials recruited adults with active or quiescent UC, comparing different doses of 5-ASAs with themselves or placebo. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain relative risk (RR) of failure to achieve remission in active UC, and RR of relapse of disease activity in quiescent UC, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated from the reciprocal of the risk difference.

RESULTS

The search identified 3,061 citations, and 37 RCTs were eligible. Of these, 11 compared 5-ASA with placebo in active UC remission, with the RR of no remission with 5-ASAs of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85; NNT=6). Doses of ≥ 2.0 g/day were more effective than <2.0 g/day for remission (RR=0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.98). There were 11 RCTs comparing 5-ASAs with placebo in preventing relapse of quiescent UC, with the RR of relapse of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55-0.76; NNT=4). Doses of ≥ 2.0 g/day appeared more effective than <2.0 g/day for preventing relapse (RR=0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

5-ASAs are highly effective for inducing remission and preventing relapse in UC. Evidence suggests that doses of ≥ 2.0 g/day have greater efficacy, although doses >2.5 g/day do not appear to lead to higher remission rates.

摘要

目的

5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中的疗效已在荟萃分析中进行了研究。然而,最近发表了几项随机对照试验(RCT),以前的荟萃分析并未研究使用的 5-ASA 剂量的影响。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库(截至 2010 年 12 月)。合格的试验招募了患有活动或缓解期 UC 的成年人,比较了不同剂量的 5-ASA 与自身或安慰剂的疗效。二项数据汇总得到活动期 UC 缓解失败的相对风险(RR),以及缓解期 UC 疾病活动复发的 RR,置信区间(CI)为 95%。从风险差异的倒数计算需要治疗的人数(NNT)。

结果

搜索共确定了 3061 条引用,有 37 项 RCT 符合条件。其中 11 项比较了 5-ASA 与活动期 UC 缓解期的安慰剂,5-ASA 无缓解的 RR 为 0.79(95% CI 0.73-0.85;NNT=6)。剂量≥2.0 g/天比剂量<2.0 g/天更有效(RR=0.91;95% CI 0.85-0.98)。有 11 项 RCT 比较了 5-ASA 与安慰剂在预防缓解期 UC 复发的疗效,复发的 RR 为 0.65(95% CI 0.55-0.76;NNT=4)。剂量≥2.0 g/天比剂量<2.0 g/天更有效(RR=0.79;95% CI 0.64-0.97)。

结论

5-ASA 对诱导 UC 缓解和预防复发非常有效。有证据表明,剂量≥2.0 g/天的疗效更高,尽管剂量>2.5 g/天似乎不会导致更高的缓解率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验