Dept of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, 32601-0275, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Apr;135(4):572-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCP7VD0NMAMQCWA.
Plasmid-mediated AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, but they are not readily identified in hospital microbiology laboratories. We tested 753 gram-negative bloodstream isolates for AmpC by using the EDTA disk test and the modified Hodge test (n = 172) and the modified Hodge test alone (n = 581). The 30-day mortality for the AmpC group was 9% (2/23) and was 6% (3/51) for the control group. The clinical response was similar: afebrile on day 2 (AmpC group, 16/23 [70%]; control group, 32/45 [71%]) and on day 4 (AmpC group, 19/22 [86%]; control group, 37/44 [84%]). Patients with isolates in the AmpC group were more likely to be in an intensive care unit at the time of the positive blood culture (P = .01) and more likely to be intubated (P = .05) than patients with isolates in the control group. Effective antibiotic treatment within the first 48 hours was given to 47 (92%) of 51 patients with isolates in the control group but to only 14 (61%) of 23 patients with isolates in the AmpC group (P = .001). The modified Hodge test and the EDTA disk test did not identify patients at risk for a poor outcome from AmpC-producing bacterial infections.
产质粒介导的 AmpC 型大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌与不良临床结局相关,但在医院微生物学实验室中不易识别。我们使用 EDTA 磁盘试验和改良 Hodge 试验(n=172)和改良 Hodge 试验单独(n=581)对 753 株革兰氏阴性血流分离株进行 AmpC 检测。AmpC 组的 30 天死亡率为 9%(2/23),对照组为 6%(3/51)。临床反应相似:第 2 天(AmpC 组,16/23 [70%];对照组,32/45 [71%])和第 4 天(AmpC 组,19/22 [86%];对照组,37/44 [84%])无发热。在阳性血培养时,AmpC 组患者更有可能在重症监护病房(P=0.01),更有可能需要插管(P=0.05)。与对照组相比,AmpC 组患者在 48 小时内接受有效抗生素治疗的比例更高(47/51 [92%]),而对照组为 14/23 [61%])(P=0.001)。改良 Hodge 试验和 EDTA 磁盘试验均未识别出 AmpC 阳性细菌感染不良预后的风险患者。