Suppr超能文献

有氧运动训练者与久坐不动者之间中心收缩压和主动脉僵硬度的差异。

Differences in central systolic blood pressure and aortic stiffness between aerobically trained and sedentary individuals.

作者信息

Laurent Pierre, Marenco Patrice, Castagna Olivier, Smulyan Harold, Blacher Jacques, Safar Michel E

机构信息

Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Ste Anne, Toulon, France.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Mar-Apr;5(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.01.003.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate central (carotid) artery blood pressure (BP) in endurance athletes. Carotid-femoral (= aortic) pulse wave velocity (PWV) together with radial and carotid tonometry and pulse wave analysis were performed at rest in 30 endurance athletes and 30 sedentary controls, all males matched for age, height, brachial systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP. Whereas brachial BP was similar in the two groups, carotid SBP and pulse pressure (PP) were higher in endurance athletes than in controls irrespective of age (123.1 ± 2.17 vs. 110.2 ± 1.29 mm Hg, and 50.9 ± 1.95 vs. 34.1 ± 1.01 mm Hg; P < .0001 for both). PP amplification evaluated from the brachial/carotid PP ratio was lower in athletes than in controls (1.05 ± 0.04 vs. 1.40 ± 0.02; P < .0001). When compared with controls, athletes had lower PWV (7.81 ± 0.17 vs. 9.8 ± 0.23 m/second; P < .0001), higher reflected wave transit time/left ventricular ejection time ratio (P = .02), and lower heart rate (52.03 ± 1.54 vs. 68.9 ± 1.72 beats/minute; P < .0001). When matched for brachial BP, central SBP and PP were higher in endurance athletes than in sedentary controls. The possible negative pathophysiological impact of increased central BP on the overall favorable effects of training deserves further study.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估耐力运动员的中心(颈动脉)动脉血压(BP)。对30名耐力运动员和30名久坐不动的对照者(均为男性,年龄、身高、肱动脉收缩压[SBP]和舒张压相匹配)在静息状态下进行了颈动脉 - 股动脉(=主动脉)脉搏波速度(PWV)测定,同时进行了桡动脉和颈动脉张力测量及脉搏波分析。尽管两组的肱动脉血压相似,但无论年龄大小,耐力运动员的颈动脉SBP和脉压(PP)均高于对照组(分别为123.1±2.17 vs. 110.2±1.29 mmHg,以及50.9±1.95 vs. 34.1±1.01 mmHg;两者P均<0.0001)。根据肱动脉/颈动脉PP比值评估的PP放大倍数在运动员中低于对照组(1.05±0.04 vs. 1.40±0.02;P<0.0001)。与对照组相比,运动员的PWV较低(7.81±0.17 vs. 9.8±0.23 m/秒;P<0.0001),反射波传导时间/左心室射血时间比值较高(P = 0.02),心率较低(52.03±1.54 vs. 68.9±1.72次/分钟;P<0.0001)。当根据肱动脉血压进行匹配时,耐力运动员的中心SBP和PP高于久坐不动的对照组。中心血压升高对训练总体有益效果可能产生的负面病理生理影响值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验