*The George Institute for Global Health †the Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(6):495-501. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820e1185.
Increased sensitivity to pressure is commonly associated with painful musculoskeletal conditions, including whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) close to the site of presumed tissue damage are thought to represent the degree of peripheral nociceptive sensitization. PPTs over healthy tissue, away from the site of injury, are a marker of central nervous system hyperexcitability. There is uncertainty, however, as to what extent does the sensitization of the nociceptive system, whether peripheral or central, contribute to the ongoing, habitual pain experienced by people with WAD.
One hundred patients with WAD were assessed within 4 weeks of their accident and followed after 3 months; 24-hour average neck pain score, PPTs at the cervical spine and tibialis anterior, demographic factors, and psychological measures were collected.
Cervical PPT and neck pain score were significantly, but weakly correlated (r = -0.20 to -0.33). There was no significant correlation between tibialis anterior PPT and pain score at any time point (r = -0.01 to -0.21). Regression analyses indicated a strong influence of generalized psychological distress and fear avoidance on the relationship between PPT and pain report.
The competing explanations for these findings are that either PPTs provide a poor marker of peripheral and central sensitivity or that these processes are only weakly related to the day-to-day pain experienced by patients with WAD. The latter explanation is supported by the confounding effect of psychological factors on pain score.
对压力的敏感性增加通常与肌肉骨骼疼痛性疾病有关,包括与挥鞭样损伤相关的疾病(WAD)。接近假定组织损伤部位的压痛阈值(PPT)被认为代表外周伤害感受敏感化的程度。远离损伤部位的健康组织上的 PPT 是中枢神经系统过度兴奋的标志物。然而,对于伤害感受系统的敏感性(无论是外周还是中枢)在多大程度上导致 WAD 患者持续习惯性疼痛存在不确定性。
在事故发生后 4 周内评估了 100 例 WAD 患者,并在 3 个月后进行了随访;收集了 24 小时平均颈部疼痛评分、颈椎和胫骨前肌 PPT、人口统计学因素和心理测量指标。
颈椎 PPT 和颈部疼痛评分呈显著但弱相关(r = -0.20 至 -0.33)。在任何时间点,胫骨前肌 PPT 与疼痛评分之间均无显著相关性(r = -0.01 至 -0.21)。回归分析表明,一般心理困扰和恐惧回避对 PPT 和疼痛报告之间的关系有很大影响。
这些发现的竞争性解释是,PPT 要么不能很好地标记外周和中枢敏感性,要么这些过程与 WAD 患者日常经历的疼痛相关性较弱。心理因素对疼痛评分的混杂影响支持了后一种解释。