Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌筛查中钼靶 X 线摄影、超声和 MRI 的成本效益比较。

Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;38(1):179-96, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.02.009.

Abstract

Screening mammography performed annually on all women beginning at age 40 years has reduced breast cancer deaths by 30% to 50%. The cost per year of life saved is well within the range for other commonly accepted medical interventions. Various studies have estimated that reduction in treatment costs through early screening detection may be 30% to 100% or more of the cost of screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening is also cost-effective for very high-risk women, such as BRCA carriers, and others at 20% or greater lifetime risk. Further studies are needed to determine whether MRI is cost-effective for those at moderately high (15%-20%) lifetime risk. Future technical advances could make MRI more cost-effective than it is today. Automated whole-breast ultrasonography will probably prove cost-effective as a supplement to mammography for women with dense breasts.

摘要

从 40 岁开始,对所有女性每年进行一次乳房 X 线筛查,可使乳腺癌死亡率降低 30%至 50%。每年每挽救一条生命的成本都在其他常见医学干预措施的范围内。各种研究估计,通过早期筛查检测降低治疗成本可能达到筛查成本的 30%至 100%甚至更多。对于 BRCA 携带者等极高风险女性以及终生风险为 20%或更高的其他女性,磁共振成像(MRI)筛查也具有成本效益。还需要进一步的研究来确定 MRI 是否对终生风险处于中度偏高(15%-20%)的人群具有成本效益。未来的技术进步可能会使 MRI 的成本效益高于当前水平。自动全乳房超声检查可能会被证明作为致密乳房女性乳房 X 线筛查的补充具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验