Suppr超能文献

将整体医学与跨专业教育和护理计划相结合:跨专业合作的挑战和机遇。

Linking integrative medicine with interprofessional education and care initiatives: challenges and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration.

机构信息

Ontario Health Human Resources Research Network, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2011 May;25(3):182-8. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.552133. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

Abstract

Although the fields of interprofessional education and collaboration (IPE/IPC) and integrative medicine (IM) are both recognised and clearly advancing as of late, a curious paradox exists: IPE/IPC and IM are both concerned with communicating about and attempting to resolve differences between healthcare professions with the fundamental goal of improving patient outcomes, yet they have remained quite distinct fields of research. This disconnect could be due to the fact that one field deals with integration within the general paradigm of biomedicine (IPE/IPC), while the other addresses integration across paradigms (IM). It is an opportune time for a critical comparison between the two. First, the main themes of IM are summarised as they are reflected in the IM literature. Second, a comparative analysis is presented focusing on the significant similarities and differences between IPE/IPC and IM. The final section addresses the question: What key learning areas from IM could benefit and enhance IPE/IPC?

摘要

尽管跨专业教育和协作(IPE/IPC)和整合医学(IM)领域最近都得到了认可并明显得到了推进,但存在一个奇怪的悖论:IPE/IPC 和 IM 都涉及到沟通和试图解决医疗保健专业之间的差异,其根本目标是改善患者的治疗效果,但它们仍然是非常不同的研究领域。这种脱节可能是因为一个领域涉及到在生物医学的一般范式内的整合(IPE/IPC),而另一个领域则涉及到跨越范式的整合(IM)。现在是对两者进行批判性比较的好时机。首先,总结了 IM 的主要主题,因为它们反映在 IM 文献中。其次,提出了一个比较分析,重点关注 IPE/IPC 和 IM 之间的显著相似之处和不同之处。最后一部分讨论了这样一个问题:整合医学中有哪些关键学习领域可以使 IPE/IPC 受益和增强?

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验