Bernetti Margherita, Abbate Rosanna, Cerini Gabriele, Gensini Gian Franco, Poggesi Loredana, Boddi Maria
Dipartimento di Area Critica Medico-Chirurgica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2011 Jan;12(1):72-81.
The intima-media thickness (IMT) is defined as the distance between the hyperechogenic inner (blood-intima interface) and outer line (media-adventitia interface) of the arterial wall. It is a surrogate marker of atherosclerotic damage. No consensus guidelines are available on which site and how carotid IMT sampling should be performed, and comparison among data from different studies is difficult. IMT is the "phenotype" of the early phases of atherosclerotic disease and is related to the main traditional risk factors. Moreover, IMT is a marker of organ damage either in the heart or in other vascular districts. Although threshold IMT values for the prediction of cardiovascular events have not been identified, high IMT values are associated with an increased occurrence of cardiovascular events. Indeed, an IMT > or = 0.9 mm was demonstrated to be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk even after age adjustment. The value of IMT as an independent risk factor is still under debate, especially in young patients at intermediate risk. Moreover, the IMT regression reported in therapeutic trials with statins and antihypertensive drugs was only weakly or not at all associated with a decrease in cardiovascular events. In comparison to carotid IMT, femoral IMT is more strictly correlated with the severity of coronary artery disease and the need for revascularization in effort angina. The simultaneous measurement of carotid and femoral IMT may improve risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease. The challenge for the future is to establish an IMT cut-off value for a better definition of the individual cardiovascular risk. Such cut-off value may be derived from the combined measurement of carotid and femoral IMT.
内膜中层厚度(IMT)定义为动脉壁高回声内层(血液-内膜界面)与外层线(中膜-外膜界面)之间的距离。它是动脉粥样硬化损伤的替代标志物。目前尚无关于应在哪个部位以及如何进行颈动脉IMT采样的共识性指南,不同研究数据之间的比较也很困难。IMT是动脉粥样硬化疾病早期阶段的“表型”,与主要的传统危险因素相关。此外,IMT是心脏或其他血管区域器官损伤的标志物。虽然尚未确定预测心血管事件的IMT阈值,但高IMT值与心血管事件发生率增加相关。事实上,即使在年龄调整后,IMT≥0.9mm也被证明与心血管风险增加相关。IMT作为独立危险因素的价值仍存在争议,尤其是在中等风险的年轻患者中。此外,他汀类药物和抗高血压药物治疗试验中报告的IMT回归与心血管事件减少仅存在微弱关联或根本无关联。与颈动脉IMT相比,股动脉IMT与冠状动脉疾病的严重程度以及劳力性心绞痛患者血管重建的需求更密切相关。同时测量颈动脉和股动脉IMT可能会改善冠心病患者的风险分层。未来的挑战是确定一个IMT临界值,以便更好地定义个体心血管风险。这样的临界值可能来自颈动脉和股动脉IMT的联合测量。