Institute of Physical Chemistry University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52a, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 May 21;13(19):8783-94. doi: 10.1039/c0cp02600j. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
Many acronyms are used in the literature for describing different kinds of amorphous ice, mainly because many different preparation routes and many different sample histories need to be distinguished. We here introduce these amorphous ices and discuss the question of how many of these forms are of relevance in the context of polyamorphism. We employ the criterion of reversible transitions between amorphous "states" in finite intervals of pressure and temperature to discriminate between independent metastable amorphous "states" and between "substates" of the same amorphous "state". We argue that the experimental evidence suggests we should consider there to be three polyamorphic "states" of ice, namely low-(LDA), high-(HDA) and very high-density amorphous ice (VHDA). In addition to the realization of reversible transitions between them, they differ in terms of their properties, e.g., compressibility, or number of "interstitial" water molecules. Thus they cannot be regarded as structurally relaxed variants of each other and so we suggest considering them as three distinct megabasins in an energy landscape visualization.
在文献中,有许多缩写词被用于描述不同类型的无定形冰,主要是因为需要区分许多不同的制备途径和许多不同的样品历史。我们在这里介绍这些无定形冰,并讨论在多晶型现象的背景下,这些形式中有多少种是相关的。我们采用在有限的压力和温度间隔内无定形“状态”之间可逆转变的标准,来区分独立的亚稳无定形“状态”和同一无定形“状态”的“亚状态”。我们认为,实验证据表明,我们应该考虑冰有三种多晶型“状态”,即低(LDA)、高(HDA)和超高密度无定形冰(VHDA)。除了它们之间的可逆转变的实现之外,它们在性质上也有所不同,例如压缩性或“间隙”水分子的数量。因此,它们不能被视为彼此结构弛豫的变体,因此我们建议将它们视为能量景观可视化中的三个不同的巨盆地。