Helal I, Chan L
University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Transplant Proc. 2011 Mar;43(2):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.054.
Recent improvements in kidney transplantation have been driven largely by lower acute rejection rates attributed to better immunosuppressive agents. In an effort to reduce the long-term toxicities of immunosuppressant drugs, corticosteroid- and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing immunosuppression protocols have become increasingly popular in managing kidney transplant recipients. Nevertheless, these strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic allograft injury (CAI) that may worsen the fate of transplant recipients. This article focuses on steroid and CNI sparing protocols to elucidate their safety and efficacy in patients receiving a kidney transplant. Steroid avoidance protocols are rapidly and increasingly being used. Studies have shown that corticosteroids are not essential to achieve excellent short- and intermediate-term results. However, the role of steroid withdrawal is only marginally beneficial and very often benefit overstated. CNI-sparing strategies have been used to help maintain the balance between allograft survival and nephrotoxicity. Trials evaluating CNI minimization have shown reduced incidence of CAI and preservation of allograft function. CNI withdrawal within 3 to 12 months after kidney transplantation improved graft function despite increased risk of acute rejection. This approach may be feasible with adequate exposure and proper usage of mammalian target of rapamacin inhibitors. Late withdrawal or conversion did not show a clear benefit. Timing and degree of renal dysfunction are key determining factors. With regards to CNI avoidance, earlier trials, such as the Symphony study, did not support the use of a CNI-free regimen of low-dose sirolimus as initial immunosuppression. However, recent studies using costimulatory blockade-based immusouppression showed that CNI avoidance is possible. The best maintenance immunosuppressive with CNI- or steroid-sparing is a work in progress and awaits longer term follow-up. The availability of newer biologics for costimulatory blockade and new immunosuppressive agents with novel mechanisms of action have the potential of using CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols to minimize the incidence of CAI and improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
肾移植领域最近的进展很大程度上得益于更好的免疫抑制剂使急性排斥反应率降低。为了降低免疫抑制药物的长期毒性,在肾移植受者的管理中,减少使用皮质类固醇和钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的免疫抑制方案越来越普遍。然而,这些策略可能会增加急性和慢性移植肾损伤(CAI)的风险,从而可能使移植受者的预后变差。本文聚焦于减少使用类固醇和CNI的方案,以阐明其在接受肾移植患者中的安全性和有效性。避免使用类固醇的方案正在迅速且越来越多地被采用。研究表明,皮质类固醇对于取得优异的短期和中期效果并非必不可少。然而,停用类固醇的作用仅略有益处,而且其益处往往被夸大。减少使用CNI的策略已被用于帮助维持移植肾存活与肾毒性之间的平衡。评估CNI最小化的试验表明,CAI的发生率降低,移植肾功能得以保留。肾移植后3至12个月内停用CNI可改善移植肾功能,尽管急性排斥反应的风险增加。在充分使用和正确使用雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂的情况下,这种方法可能可行。晚期停用或转换未显示出明显益处。肾功能不全的时机和程度是关键决定因素。关于避免使用CNI,早期试验,如Symphony研究,不支持使用低剂量西罗莫司的无CNI方案作为初始免疫抑制。然而,最近使用基于共刺激阻断的免疫抑制的研究表明,避免使用CNI是可行。采用减少使用CNI或类固醇的最佳维持免疫抑制方案仍在研究中,有待长期随访。用于共刺激阻断的新型生物制剂以及具有新作用机制的新型免疫抑制剂的出现,有可能采用减少使用CNI和类固醇的方案,以降低肾移植受者CAI的发生率并改善长期预后。