Tanjasiri Sora Park, Wiersma Lenny, Briand Greta, Faletau Vaka, Lepule Jonathan, Nacpil Lianne, Eichenauer Jan
California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):19-25. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0001.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) holds the promise of improving the planning, conduct, and long-term translation of research findings into community settings.
This 2-year, exploratory study applied CBPR structures and processes to the identification of individual, cultural and community factors associated with obesity among Pacific Islander (PI) youth in Southern California.
We describe the CBPR principles and strategies used by a community-university partnership to develop, implement, and report on the findings from assessments of obesity, physical activity, and nutritional intake among PI youth.
Although CBPR planning processes led to successes in community-based youth recruitment and retention, we learned key lessons regarding implementation of tailored assessment protocols, often involving problems arising from the university side of the CBPR collaborative.
CBPR has its strengths and limits; more studies are needed that report on processes to increase our understanding of how to balance research rigor with community sustainability.
基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)有望改善研究的规划、实施以及将研究结果长期转化到社区环境中。
这项为期两年的探索性研究将CBPR的结构和流程应用于识别南加州太平洋岛民(PI)青少年肥胖相关的个体、文化和社区因素。
我们描述了一个社区-大学合作关系所采用的CBPR原则和策略,以开发、实施并报告PI青少年肥胖、身体活动和营养摄入评估的结果。
尽管CBPR规划流程在基于社区的青少年招募和留用方面取得了成功,但我们在实施定制评估方案方面吸取了关键教训,这些问题往往源于CBPR合作中大学一方。
CBPR有其优势和局限性;需要更多关于流程的研究报告,以增进我们对如何在研究严谨性与社区可持续性之间取得平衡的理解。