Section for Social Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Department of Medicine and Health, Linkoping University, Sweden.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2011 Jun;18(2):163-7. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2010.542561.
In 1982, when Sweden got a new Health Service Act, the health sector was given a new role - to collect, analyse and actively disseminate the knowledge it gained. A National Safety Promotion Programme was build up by the National Board for Health and Welfare, and a National Inter-sector Cooperation Group and medical advisory board were established. In 1992, the programme was transferred to the National Institute of Public Health. Later the Institute was given a new role and therefore the programme was relocated to the Swedish Rescue Service Agency. In some aspects we can see a parallel with the paradigm that was behind the Civil Protection Act 2003 and the Health Service Act 1982. It was a logic consequence to move the national programme to the rescue service sector. Within the National Rescue Service Agency the programme ended up in the line organisation, which lacked a cross-sector work orientation. The programme was closed down. In the article the reason for the decisions is described and also the background and the possibilities for the programme to act in different national boards as well as the preconditions for an inter-sector group.
1982 年,瑞典颁布新的《卫生服务法案》,赋予卫生部门新的角色——收集、分析并积极传播所获得的知识。国家卫生局设立了国家安全促进计划,并成立了国家跨部门合作小组和医学咨询委员会。1992 年,该计划转由国家公共卫生研究所负责。后来,该研究所被赋予新的角色,因此该计划被转移到瑞典救援服务署。在某些方面,我们可以看到这与 2003 年《民防法》和 1982 年《卫生服务法》背后的范式存在相似之处。将国家计划转移到救援服务部门是合乎逻辑的结果。在国家救援服务署内,该计划最终由缺乏跨部门工作方向的直线组织负责。该计划被关闭。本文描述了做出这些决定的原因,以及该计划在不同国家委员会中运作的背景和可能性,以及跨部门小组的前提条件。