Narahari Saravu R, Aggithaya Madhur Guruprasad, Suraj Kumbla R
Institute of Applied Dermatology, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010 Oct;1(4):254-67. doi: 10.4103/0974-7788.76791.
This protocol is intended primarily for Ayurveda doctors who wish to take up systematic reviews along with an expert who has experience in doing such reviews. We have structured this protocol by incorporating the principles of patient treatment in Ayurveda, within the Cochrane framework, using Vitiligo as a model. The treatment section provides a comprehensive list of classical medicines used in the treatment of the disease. This will help in increasing the search terms. Such a list also helps to determine the needs of individualized treatment principles used in the trial and to assess the confounding factors. The search strategy includes an extensive listing of eastern data bases and hand searching. In Ayurveda, the titles of articles are not in the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO) pattern and sometimes the title and methodology do not tally. Therefore, a search of all types of studies is necessary to pool all the relevant publications. A data extraction form is proposed for use in assessing the quality of Ayurvedic studies. The form provides a template for performing evidence reviews of Ayurvedic interventions.
本方案主要面向希望开展系统评价的阿育吠陀医生,以及有此类评价经验的专家。我们在Cochrane框架内,以白癜风为模型,通过纳入阿育吠陀患者治疗原则来构建本方案。治疗部分提供了该疾病治疗中使用的经典药物的综合列表。这将有助于增加检索词。这样的列表也有助于确定试验中使用的个体化治疗原则的需求,并评估混杂因素。检索策略包括广泛列出东方数据库并进行手工检索。在阿育吠陀中,文章标题不符合人群、干预措施、对照和结局(PICO)模式,有时标题与方法也不一致。因此,有必要检索所有类型的研究,以汇总所有相关出版物。我们提出了一种数据提取表,用于评估阿育吠陀研究的质量。该表格为开展阿育吠陀干预措施的证据评价提供了一个模板。