Faculdade de Odontologia da USP, Departamento de Odontologia Social. Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo/SP, Brasil 05508-900.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Apr;75(4):557-64.
In 2002, the Brazilian Ministry of Education approved the official curricular guidelines for undergraduate courses in Brazil to be adopted by the nation's 188 dental schools. In 2005-06, the Brazilian Dental Education Association (BDEA) promoted workshops in forty-eight of the schools to verify the degree of transformation of the curriculum based on these guidelines. Among the areas analyzed were course philosophy (variables were v1: knowledge production based on the needs of the Brazilian Public Health System [BPHS]; v2: health determinants; and v3: postgraduate studies and permanent education); pedagogical skills (v4: curricular structure; v5: changes in pedagogic and didactic skills; and v6: course program orientation); and dental practice scenarios (v7: diversity of the scenarios for training/learning; v8: academic health care centers opened to the BPHS; and v9: participation of students in health care delivery for the population). The subjects consisted of faculty members (n=711), students (n=228), and employees (n=14). The results showed an incipient degree of curriculum transformation. The degree of innovation was statistically different depending on the type of university (public or private) for variables 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Private schools reported a higher level of innovation than public institutions. Resistance to transforming the dental curriculum according to the official guidelines may be linked to an ideological conception that supports the private practice model, continues to have faculty members direct all classroom activities, and prevents students from developing an understanding of professional practice as targeted towards the oral health needs of all segments of society.
2002 年,巴西教育部批准了全国 188 所牙科学校采用的本科课程官方教学大纲。2005-06 年,巴西牙科教育协会(BDEA)在其中的 48 所学校举办了研讨会,以验证根据这些指导方针对课程的转变程度。分析的领域包括课程理念(变量包括 v1:基于巴西公共卫生系统需求的知识生产[v1];v2:健康决定因素;v3:研究生学习和继续教育);教学技能(v4:课程结构;v5:教学技能的变化;v6:课程计划导向);以及牙科实践场景(v7:培训/学习场景的多样性;v8:向 BPHS 开放的学术医疗中心;v9:学生参与为人口提供医疗保健)。研究对象包括教师(n=711)、学生(n=228)和员工(n=14)。结果表明课程转变处于起步阶段。根据大学类型(公立或私立),变量 1、2、4、5、6 和 7 的创新程度存在统计学差异。私立学校报告的创新程度高于公立学校。根据官方指导方针改变牙科课程的阻力可能与支持私人执业模式的思想观念有关,这种观念仍然让教师主导所有课堂活动,并阻止学生了解针对社会各阶层口腔健康需求的专业实践。