基于动机的干预措施促进结肠镜筛查：恐惧管理模型和动机访谈的整合。
Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: an integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing.
机构信息
Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
出版信息
J Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;16(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1177/1359105311402408. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been low despite effectiveness of screening in reducing CRC mortality. This article outlines the theoretical background and development of an innovative, telephone-based risk communication designed to promote screening among individuals at increased risk for familial CRC. This ongoing intervention integrates the Extended Parallel Process Model of fear management and the motivational interviewing counselling style. Tailoring and implementation intentions are incorporated. The primary outcome is self-reported colonoscopy within nine months following intervention. If proven effective, the remote intervention could be broadly disseminated to individuals at increased familial CRC risk, especially those in geographically underserved areas.
摘要
结直肠癌（CRC）的筛查率一直很低，尽管筛查对于降低 CRC 的死亡率是有效的。本文概述了一种创新的、基于电话的风险沟通理论背景和发展，旨在促进家族性 CRC 风险增加的个体进行筛查。这种正在进行的干预措施整合了恐惧管理的扩展平行过程模型和动机性访谈咨询风格。定制和实施意图也被包含在内。主要结果是在干预后九个月内自我报告结肠镜检查。如果证明有效，这种远程干预可以广泛传播给家族性 CRC 风险增加的个体，特别是那些在地理上服务不足的地区。
相似文献
1
Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: an integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing.
J Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;16(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1177/1359105311402408. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
2
Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 8.
3
A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Oct;38(2):71-85. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9140-5.
4
A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.
Technol Health Care. 2012;20(1):25-35. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0653.
5
Effectiveness of a short message service intervention to motivate people with positive results in preliminary colorectal cancer screening to undergo colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;125(13):2252-2261. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32043. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
6
Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004303.
7
Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Dec;38(4):487-498. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Motivational interviewing as an intervention to increase adolescent self-efficacy and promote weight loss: methodology and design.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 10;11:459. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-459.
9
Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: a theory-based model.
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Jun;47(3):280-91. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9562-y.
10
Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer screening among underserved Latina women: a randomized pilot study.
Cancer Control. 2009 Jan;16(1):79-87. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600112.
引用本文的文献
1
The Development and Evaluation of Novel Patient Educational Material for a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Result in Hereditary Cancer Genes.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 16;31(6):3361-3378. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31060256.
2
Theory-based behavior change intervention to increase uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant: The PREVENT randomized controlled trial.
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):18246-18257. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6417. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Effectiveness of a tailored communication intervention on colonoscopy uptake for firstdegree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;9(9):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.04.007. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Extended parallel process model (EPPM) in evaluating lung Cancer risk perception among older smokers.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):1872. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11896-1.
5
Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;73:123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling.
J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):33-58. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0145-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer.
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):694-706. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9893-1.
8
Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;17(1):57-70. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1267567. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
9
Structuring Health in Colorectal Cancer Screening Conversations: An Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems.
South Commun J. 2015;80(5):416-432. doi: 10.1080/1041794X.2015.1081974. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
A Threat- and Efficacy-Based Framework to Understand Confidence in Vaccines among the Public Health Workforce.
Vaccines (Basel). 2013 Apr 8;1(2):77-87. doi: 10.3390/vaccines1020077.
本文引用的文献
1
The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 May;38(5):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
2
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Jan;8(1):8-61. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0003.
3
The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses.
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Nov;65(11):1232-45. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20638.
4
Use of colon cancer testing in rural Colorado primary care practices.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Oct;24(10):1095-100. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1063-0. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
5
A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 May 29;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-37.
6
A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings.
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Apr;37(2):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9103-x.
7
Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Jun;29(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
8
A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
9
Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 8.
10
Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0445-4. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Zotero 插件