Suppr超能文献

推理和速度训练对儿童的差异化影响。

Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children.

机构信息

Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2011 May;14(3):582-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether intensive training can ameliorate cognitive skills in children. Children aged 7 to 9 from low socioeconomic backgrounds participated in one of two cognitive training programs for 60 minutes/day and 2 days/week, for a total of 8 weeks. Both training programs consisted of commercially available computerized and non-computerized games. Reasoning training emphasized planning and relational integration; speed training emphasized rapid visual detection and rapid motor responses. Standard assessments of reasoning ability - the Test of Non-Verbal Intelligence (TONI-3) and cognitive speed (Coding B from WISC IV) - were administered to all children before and after training. Neither group was exposed to these standardized tests during training. Children in the reasoning group improved substantially on TONI (Cohen's d = 1.51), exhibiting an average increase of 10 points in Performance IQ, but did not improve on Coding. By contrast, children in the speed group improved substantially on Coding (d = 1.15), but did not improve on TONI. Counter to widespread belief, these results indicate that both fluid reasoning and processing speed are modifiable by training.

摘要

本研究旨在确定强化训练是否能改善儿童的认知技能。来自社会经济背景较低的 7 至 9 岁儿童参加了为期 8 周、每天 60 分钟、每周 2 天的两种认知训练方案之一。两种训练方案都包含商业化的计算机化和非计算机化游戏。推理训练强调计划和关系整合;速度训练强调快速视觉检测和快速运动反应。在训练之前和之后,所有儿童都接受了标准推理能力评估——非言语智力测验(TONI-3)和认知速度(WISC-IV 中的编码 B)。训练过程中两组都没有接触这些标准化测试。推理组的儿童在 TONI 上有显著提高(Cohen's d = 1.51),表现为在操作智商上平均提高 10 分,但在编码上没有提高。相比之下,速度组的儿童在编码上有显著提高(d = 1.15),但在 TONI 上没有提高。与普遍看法相反,这些结果表明,流体推理和处理速度都可以通过训练来改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验