Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3414-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1677-2. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Single-incision pediatric endosurgical (SIPES) pyloromyotomy is frequently used for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at our center. Our initial SIPES approach mirrored the conventional, triangulated laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Because an increased number of perforations were noted on our initial analysis, a more straightforward Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy was developed. This study compares the current Cross-technique SIPES pyloromyotomy to the previous standard SIPES operation.
The Cross-technique entails grasping the antrum with the surgeon's left hand instrument, retracting toward the left lower quadrant, and thereby orienting the pylorus obliquely toward the right upper quadrant. The serosal incision and muscular spreading is accomplished using a right-hand instrument that crosses over the left hand grasper. Demographic variables, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, conversion rate, and postoperative length of stay were compared.
Twenty-nine Cross-technique patients were compared with 23 in the standard group. The Cross-technique was faster than the standard procedure (21 ± 5 vs. 27 ± 12 min, p = 0.03) and EBL was lower (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6 ml, p = 0.02). There were two mucosal perforations requiring conversions to triangulated 3-access-site laparoscopy in the standard, and one conversion to open surgery in the Cross-technique group. Patients who underwent cross-technique pyloromyotomy weighed less (3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 4.0 ± 0.5 kg, p = 0.012), but there were no differences in age, gender ratio, conversion rate, or length of stay. There was one postoperative wound infection in the cross-technique, but none in the standard group. No patients required reoperation. All participating surgeons felt that the cross-technique was more ergonomic and easier to perform than the standard SIPES technique.
The Cross-technique appears superior to standard SIPES pyloromyotomy and should be preferentially used for single-incision endosurgical pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
单切口小儿内镜(SIPES)幽门肌切开术常用于我院治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄。我们最初的 SIPES 方法与传统的三角腹腔镜幽门肌切开术相似。由于最初的分析中发现了更多的穿孔,因此开发了一种更直接的 Cross-technique SIPES 幽门肌切开术。本研究比较了目前的 Cross-technique SIPES 幽门肌切开术与之前的标准 SIPES 手术。
Cross-technique 手术中,术者左手器械抓住胃窦部,向左侧下方牵拉,使幽门斜向右上象限。使用右手器械穿过左手抓钳进行浆膜切开和肌肉扩张。比较两组患者的一般资料、手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、并发症、中转率及术后住院时间。
29 例 Cross-technique 患者与 23 例标准组患者进行比较。Cross-technique 组的手术时间短于标准组(21±5 分钟 vs. 27±12 分钟,p=0.03),EBL 也较低(1.3±0.5 毫升 vs. 1.7±0.6 毫升,p=0.02)。标准组中有 2 例黏膜穿孔需转为三角 3 孔腹腔镜,Cross-technique 组中有 1 例转为开放手术。行 Cross-technique 幽门肌切开术的患者体重较轻(3.6±0.6 公斤 vs. 4.0±0.5 公斤,p=0.012),但在年龄、性别比例、中转率或住院时间方面无差异。Cross-technique 组有 1 例术后伤口感染,标准组无感染。无患者需要再次手术。所有参与手术的医生都认为 Cross-technique 比标准 SIPES 技术更符合人体工程学,更容易操作。
Cross-technique 似乎优于标准 SIPES 幽门肌切开术,对于肥厚性幽门狭窄的单切口内镜幽门肌切开术应优先选用。