Bohay Mark, Blakely Daniel P, Tamplin Andrea K, Radvansky Gabriel A
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Am J Psychol. 2011 Spring;124(1):63-73. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.
In previous work assessing memory at various levels of representation, namely the surface form, textbase, and situation model levels, participants read texts but were otherwise not actively engaged with the texts. The current study tested the influence of active engagement with the material via note taking, along with the opportunity to review such notes, and the modality of presentation (text vs. spoken). The influence of these manipulations was assessed both immediately and 1 week later. In Experiment 1 participants read a text, whereas in Experiment 2 participants watched a video recording of the material being read as a lecture. For each experiment the opportunity to take notes was manipulated within participants, and the opportunity to review these notes before the test was manipulated between participants. Note taking improved performance at the situation model level in both experiments, although there was also some suggestion of benefit for the surface form. Thus, active engagement with material, such as note taking, appears to have the greatest benefit at the deeper levels of understanding.
在之前评估不同表征水平(即表层形式、文本基础和情境模型水平)记忆的研究中,参与者阅读文本,但除此之外并未积极与文本互动。当前研究测试了通过做笔记积极参与材料的影响,以及复习这些笔记的机会和呈现方式(文本与口语)。这些操作的影响在即时和1周后都进行了评估。在实验1中,参与者阅读一篇文本,而在实验2中,参与者观看一段作为讲座的材料阅读视频记录。对于每个实验,做笔记的机会在参与者内部进行操控,而在测试前复习这些笔记的机会在参与者之间进行操控。在两个实验中,做笔记都提高了情境模型水平的表现,尽管也有一些迹象表明对表层形式也有帮助。因此,积极参与材料,如做笔记,似乎在更深层次的理解上有最大的益处。