From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Family Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1160-1166. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318213cbb1.
To estimate whether the Medicaid-Title XIX Sterilization Consent Form (SCF) format--"standard" compared with "low-literacy"--is associated with women's understanding of tubal sterilization.
This study was a randomized trial that took place in an obstetrics and gynecology residency clinic in the southeastern United States. Women, aged 21 to 45 years, were randomly allocated to receive a copy of either the standard or the low-literacy Medicaid-Title XIX SCF. A research assistant assessed women's sociodemographic characteristics, health-literacy skills, and understanding of sterilization using items from the Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Knowledge questionnaire. Women were also queried regarding their preferences for either version of the Medicaid-Title XIX SCF.
We included 201 women in the study. Compared with women in the standard group (n=99), women in the low-literacy group (n=102) with no additional counseling better understood the length of time required between signing the form and undergoing sterilization (23.6% difference between groups, P<.01), the time interval until the form expired (33.7% difference between groups, P<.01), permanence of sterilization (15.7% difference between groups, P=.01), and that nonpermanent contraceptive options as effective as sterilization are available (8.2% difference between groups, P=.02). When given the choice to select either Medicaid-Title XIX SCF, 189 (94%) preferred the low-literacy version.
Our results support replacing the standard Medicaid-Title XIX SCF with the low-literacy version to foster increased understanding of sterilization.
评估医疗补助计划-第十九章绝育同意书(SCF)格式——“标准”与“低识字率”——是否与女性对输卵管绝育的理解有关。
本研究为一项在美国东南部妇产科住院医师诊所进行的随机试验。年龄在 21 至 45 岁的女性被随机分配接受标准或低识字率的医疗补助计划-第十九章 SCF。一名研究助理使用产后输卵管绝育知识问卷中的项目评估女性的社会人口统计学特征、健康素养技能和对绝育的理解。还询问了女性对医疗补助计划-第十九章 SCF 两种版本的偏好。
我们纳入了 201 名女性进行研究。与标准组(n=99)的女性相比,未接受额外咨询的低识字率组(n=102)的女性更好地理解了签署表格和进行绝育之间所需的时间(两组之间存在 23.6%的差异,P<.01),表格过期的时间间隔(两组之间存在 33.7%的差异,P<.01),绝育的永久性(两组之间存在 15.7%的差异,P=.01),以及永久性避孕措施与绝育一样有效(两组之间存在 8.2%的差异,P=.02)。当被给予选择选择任何一种医疗补助计划-第十九章 SCF 时,189 名(94%)女性更喜欢低识字率版本。
我们的结果支持用低识字率版本替代标准的医疗补助计划-第十九章 SCF,以促进对绝育的更深入理解。