Suppr超能文献

利用货币和非货币激励措施提高威斯康星州妊娠风险评估监测系统中非裔美国人的响应率。

Use of monetary and nonmonetary incentives to increase response rates among African Americans in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin Survey Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1582, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2012 May;16(4):785-91. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0780-2.

Abstract

From 2009 to 2010, an experiment was conducted to increase response rates among African American mothers in the Wisconsin Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Sample members were randomly assigned to groups that received a prepaid, cash incentive of $5 (n = 219); a coupon for diapers valued at $6 (n = 210); or no incentive (n = 209). Incentives were included with the questionnaire, which was mailed to respondents. We examined the effects of the incentives on several outcomes, including response rates, cost effectiveness, survey response distributions, and item nonresponse. Response rates were significantly higher for the cash group than for the coupon (42.5 vs. 32.4%, P < .05) or no incentive group (42.5 vs. 30.1%, P < .01); the coupon and no incentive groups performed similarly. While absolute costs were the highest for the cash group, the cost per completed survey was the lowest. The incentives had limited effects on response distributions for specific survey questions. Although respondents completing the survey by mail in the cash and coupon groups exhibited a trend toward being less likely to have missing data, the effect was not significant. Compared to a coupon or no incentive, a small cash incentive significantly improved response rates and was cost effective among African American respondents in Wisconsin PRAMS. Incentives had only limited effects, however, on survey response distributions, and no significant effects on item nonresponse.

摘要

2009 年至 2010 年,威斯康星州妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)开展了一项实验,旨在提高非裔美国母亲的回应率。样本成员被随机分配到以下三组:收到 5 美元预付现金奖励的组(n=219);收到价值 6 美元尿布优惠券的组(n=210);或无奖励组(n=209)。奖励与问卷一起寄给受访者。我们考察了奖励对几个结果的影响,包括回应率、成本效益、调查回应分布和项目无回应。现金奖励组的回应率明显高于优惠券组(42.5%比 32.4%,P<.05)或无奖励组(42.5%比 30.1%,P<.01);优惠券组和无奖励组的表现相似。虽然现金组的绝对成本最高,但每份完成的调查的成本最低。奖励对特定调查问题的回应分布的影响有限。虽然通过邮件完成调查的现金和优惠券组的受访者在数据缺失方面的可能性较低,但这种影响并不显著。与优惠券或无奖励相比,小额现金奖励可显著提高威斯康星州 PRAMS 中非洲裔美国受访者的回应率,且具有成本效益。然而,奖励对调查回应分布的影响有限,对项目无回应也没有显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验