Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA.
J Periodontol. 2011 Dec;82(12):1749-56. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100661. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Implants restored according to a platform-switching concept (implant abutment interface with a reduced diameter relative to the implant platform diameter) present less crestal bone loss than implants restored with a standard protocol. When implants are placed adjacent to one another, this bone loss may combine through overlapping, thereby causing loss of the interproximal height of bone and papilla. The present study compares the effects of two interimplant distances (2 and 3 mm) on bone maintenance when bone-level implants with platform-switching are used.
This study evaluates marginal bone level preservation and soft tissue quality around a bone-level implant after 2 months of healing in minipig mandibles. The primary objective is to evaluate histologically and histomorphometrically the affect that an implant design with a horizontally displaced implant-abutment junction has on the height of the crest of bone, between adjacent implants separated by two different distances.
Results show that the interproximal bone loss measured from the edge of the implant platform to the bone crest was not different for interimplant distances of 2 or 3 mm. The horizontal position of the bone relative to the microgap on platform level (horizontal component of crestal bone loss) was 0.31 ± 0.3 mm for the 2-mm interimplant distance and 0.57 ± 0.51 mm above the platform 8 weeks after implantation for the 3-mm interimplant distance.
This study shows that interimplant bone levels can be maintained at similar levels for 2- and 3-mm distances. The horizontally displaced implant-abutment junction provided for a more coronal position of the first point of bone-implant contact. The study reveals a smaller horizontal component at the crest of bone than has been reported for non-horizontally displaced implant-abutment junctions.
与标准方案相比,采用平台转换概念(种植体基台界面的直径相对于种植体平台直径减小)修复的种植体引起的牙槽嵴骨吸收较少。当种植体彼此相邻放置时,这种骨吸收可能会通过重叠而结合,从而导致骨和乳头的近中高度丧失。本研究比较了使用具有平台转换的骨水平种植体时两种种植体间距离(2mm 和 3mm)对骨维持的影响。
本研究评估了在小型猪下颌骨中愈合 2 个月后,骨水平种植体周围边缘骨水平保存和软组织质量。主要目的是从种植体平台边缘到骨嵴的高度评估具有水平移位的种植体-基台连接的种植体设计对相邻种植体之间的骨高度的影响,相邻种植体之间的距离为 2mm 和 3mm。
结果表明,2mm 和 3mm 种植体间距离的近中骨吸收量无差异。相对于平台水平的骨的水平位置(骨嵴骨吸收的水平成分)为 2mm 种植体间距离时为 0.31±0.3mm,植入后 8 周时平台上方 3mm 种植体间距离为 0.57±0.51mm。
本研究表明,2mm 和 3mm 种植体间距离的近中骨水平可以维持相似水平。水平移位的种植体-基台连接为第一点骨-种植体接触提供了更冠方的位置。研究显示,与非水平移位的种植体-基台连接相比,骨嵴的水平成分更小。