Suppr超能文献

采用纤维增强复合树脂修复的根管治疗前磨牙的抗折性能

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with fibre-reinforced composite restorations.

作者信息

Geerts Greta, Pitout Etienne, Visser Herklaas

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Tygerberg, RSA.

出版信息

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011 Mar;19(1):25-31.

Abstract

This study investigated the fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated premolars restored with a glass fibre-reinforced composite resin. Endodontically treated maxillary premolars were divided in 4 groups: group O: occlusal access opening restored with direct composite; group O+: as group O but with fibre reinforcement; group MOD: occlusal access opening and mesio-distal (MOD) cavity restored with direct composite; group MOD+: as group MOD but with additional fibre reinforcement. Pairwise comparisons of the fracture force among all groups was performed (95% confidence level). Fractures were classified in 4 groups depending on the type of fracture. Group O was the strongest (452.7N) and group MOD the weakest (292.4N). Fracture resistance was significantly different among all groups, except between groups O+ and MOD+. The majority of the unreinforced teeth displayed unfavourable fractures, while the reinforced teeth displayed more favourable fractures. The incorporation of glass fibre weakened endodontically treated but otherwise intact premolars; premolars with MOD restorations were stronger if reinforced with fibres. Fibre reinforcement led to more favourable fractures.

摘要

本研究调查了用玻璃纤维增强复合树脂修复的经根管治疗的前磨牙的抗折性和失效模式。将经根管治疗的上颌前磨牙分为4组:O组:用直接复合树脂修复咬合面开髓孔;O+组:与O组相同,但有纤维增强;MOD组:用直接复合树脂修复咬合面开髓孔和近远中(MOD)洞;MOD+组:与MOD组相同,但有额外的纤维增强。对所有组之间的折裂力进行两两比较(95%置信水平)。根据折裂类型将折裂分为4组。O组最强(452.7N),MOD组最弱(292.4N)。除O+组和MOD+组之间外,所有组的抗折性均有显著差异。大多数未增强的牙齿表现出不利的折裂,而增强的牙齿表现出更有利的折裂。玻璃纤维的加入使经根管治疗但其他方面完好的前磨牙变弱;有MOD修复的前磨牙如果用纤维增强则更强。纤维增强导致更有利的折裂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验