Suppr超能文献

胸大肌腱断裂:修复技术的生物力学分析。

Pectoralis major tendon rupture: a biomechanical analysis of repair techniques.

机构信息

Steadman-Hawkins Clinics of the Carolinas, 200 Patewood Drive, Suite C100, Greenville, South Carolina 29615, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2011 Nov;29(11):1783-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.21438. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

Abstract

Rupture of the insertion of the pectoralis major muscle to the proximal humerus is becoming a common injury. Repair of these ruptures increases patient satisfaction, strength, and cosmesis, and shortens return to competitive sports. Several repair techniques have been described, but recently many surgeons are using suture anchors. The traditional repair technique uses transosseous sutures, but no study has biomechanically compared the strength of these two repair techniques in human cadavers. Twelve fresh-frozen human shoulder specimens were dissected. The pectoralis major tendon insertion was cut from the bone and repaired using one of the two repair techniques: specimens were randomly assigned to transosseous trough with suture tied over bone versus four suture anchors. The fixation constructs were pulled to failure at 4 mm/s on a materials testing system. The mean ultimate failure load of the transosseous repairs was 611 N and the mean ultimate failure load of the suture anchor repair was 620 N. The mean stiffness of the transosseous repair was 32 and 28 N/mm for the suture anchor group. We found no statistically significant difference between these two repair techniques.

摘要

胸大肌止点近端肱骨撕脱伤变得越来越常见。这些撕裂伤的修复可以提高患者的满意度、力量和美观度,并缩短重返竞技运动的时间。已经描述了几种修复技术,但最近许多外科医生都在使用缝线锚钉。传统的修复技术使用经骨缝线,但没有研究从生物力学角度比较这两种修复技术在人体标本中的强度。12 个新鲜冷冻的人肩关节标本被解剖。切断胸大肌肌腱止点与骨连接处,使用两种修复技术之一进行修复:标本随机分为经骨槽缝线穿过骨与打结组和 4 个缝线锚钉组。在材料测试系统上以 4mm/s 的速度将固定装置拉至失效。经骨修复的平均极限失效负荷为 611N,缝线锚钉修复的平均极限失效负荷为 620N。经骨修复的平均刚度为 32N/mm,缝线锚钉组为 28N/mm。我们发现这两种修复技术之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验