Aktay Sevima A, Kowaleski Michael P
Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Foster Hospital for Small Animals, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA.
Vet Surg. 2011 Jun;40(4):418-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00834.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
To compare mechanical performance of 2 orientations of the 5 mm Corkscrew® suture anchor with #5 Fiberwire® .
In vitro biomechanical study.
Suture anchor-suture constructs (n=40).
Acute and cyclic tensile loads were applied to suture threaded through eyelets of 40 anchors perpendicular to the long axis of the anchor. Eyelets were positioned so that the suture pull was in line with (anchor rotation angle of 0° [ARA 0]) or 90° (ARA 90) to the eyelet plane. Load at failure, stiffness, and cycles to failure were determined.
All constructs failed by suture breakage at the eyelet. Mean load at failure was significantly higher in the ARA 90 group (634 ± 93 N) compared with the ARA 0 group (495 ± 52 N; P=.0015). No significant difference was found between groups for mean number of cycles to failure (270 ± 177 versus 178 ± 109; P=.2166) and stiffness (50 ± 4 versus 48 ± 5 N/mm; P=.3141).
The Corkscrew® 5 mm suture anchor with Fiberwire® suture fails via suture breakage at the eyelet under higher acute loads if the suture is loaded at an angle of 90° compared with 0° with respect to the plane of the eyelet.
比较5毫米Corkscrew®缝线锚钉两种方向与#5 Fiberwire®的力学性能。
体外生物力学研究。
缝线锚钉-缝线构建物(n = 40)。
对穿过40个锚钉小孔且垂直于锚钉长轴的缝线施加急性和循环拉伸负荷。小孔的位置设置成使缝线拉力与小孔平面成一条直线(锚钉旋转角度为0° [ARA 0])或90°(ARA 90)。测定失效负荷、刚度和失效循环次数。
所有构建物均因小孔处缝线断裂而失效。与ARA 0组(495 ± 52 N)相比,ARA 90组的平均失效负荷显著更高(634 ± 93 N;P = .0015)。两组之间在平均失效循环次数(270 ± 177对178 ± 109;P = .2166)和刚度(50 ± 4对48 ± 5 N/mm;P = .3141)方面未发现显著差异。
与小孔平面成90°加载缝线相比,与小孔平面成0°加载缝线时,带有Fiberwire®缝线的5毫米Corkscrew®缝线锚钉在更高急性负荷下会因小孔处缝线断裂而失效。