Suppr超能文献

认知反射测验在启发式偏差任务中的预测作用。

The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, 126 BSB, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1275-89. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1.

Abstract

The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is designed to measure the tendency to override a prepotent response alternative that is incorrect and to engage in further reflection that leads to the correct response. In this study, we showed that the CRT is a more potent predictor of performance on a wide sample of tasks from the heuristics-and-biases literature than measures of cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and executive functioning. Although the CRT has a substantial correlation with cognitive ability, a series of regression analyses indicated that the CRT was a unique predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. It accounted for substantial additional variance after the other measures of individual differences had been statistically controlled. We conjecture that this is because neither intelligence tests nor measures of executive functioning assess the tendency toward miserly processing in the way that the CRT does. We argue that the CRT is a particularly potent measure of the tendency toward miserly processing because it is a performance measure rather than a self-report measure.

摘要

认知反射测验(CRT;弗雷德里克,2005)旨在衡量人们是否倾向于克服错误的强烈反应选择,并进行进一步的思考,从而得出正确的答案。在这项研究中,我们表明,与认知能力、思维倾向和执行功能的衡量标准相比,CRT 是对来自启发式偏差文献的广泛任务样本表现的更有力预测指标。虽然 CRT 与认知能力有很强的相关性,但一系列回归分析表明,CRT 是启发式偏差任务表现的独特预测指标。在对其他个体差异衡量标准进行统计控制后,它解释了大量额外的方差。我们推测,这是因为智力测试和执行功能的衡量标准都没有像 CRT 那样评估吝啬处理的倾向。我们认为,CRT 是衡量吝啬处理倾向的一种特别有力的衡量标准,因为它是一种绩效衡量标准,而不是自我报告衡量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验