Hylwa Sara A, Bury Jessica E, Davis Mark D P, Pittelkow Mark, Bostwick J Michael
Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 2011 Sep;147(9):1041-5. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.114. Epub 2011 May 16.
To review the results of skin biopsies and patient-provided specimens from patients whose assessment was consistent with delusional infestation, including delusions of parasitosis.
Retrospective medical record review.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
The study population comprised all patients who were seen at Mayo Clinic and had a diagnosis of delusional skin infestation, including delusions of parasitosis, between 2001 and 2007, and who underwent biopsies as part of their dermatologic evaluations or brought samples to their clinical consultations.
The results of examination of these biopsy and patient-provided specimens.
A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria for this study: 80 received biopsies, 80 had self-procured skin specimens, and 52 patients received biopsies and provided specimens. No biopsy specimen (0 of 80) provided evidence to support skin infestation. The most common interpretations in the 80 biopsy specimens were dermatitis in 49 of 80 (61%); excoriation, ulceration, or erosion in 38 (48%); and nonspecific dermal inflammation in 25 (31%). Patient-provided specimens were most frequently assessed by the physician (generally a dermatologist) evaluating the patient, although 20 of the 80 samples (25%) were submitted for pathologic evaluation. Of these 80 specimens, 10 (13%) contained insects. All but 1 of the insects were noninfesting varieties; 1 (1%) was a pubic louse. The remaining findings consisted of cutaneous debris, environmental detritus, or plant material.
In patients with suspected delusional infestation, neither skin biopsies nor examination of patient-provided specimens provided objective evidence of skin infestation.
回顾皮肤活检结果以及来自评估结果符合妄想性寄生虫感染(包括寄生虫妄想症)患者自行提供的标本情况。
回顾性病历审查。
明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所。
研究人群包括2001年至2007年间在梅奥诊所就诊且诊断为妄想性皮肤寄生虫感染(包括寄生虫妄想症)、并作为皮肤科评估一部分接受活检或在临床会诊时带来样本的所有患者。
这些活检及患者提供标本的检查结果。
共有108名患者符合本研究的纳入标准:80名接受了活检,80名有自行采集的皮肤标本,52名患者既接受了活检又提供了标本。没有活检标本(80份中的0份)能提供支持皮肤寄生虫感染的证据。80份活检标本中最常见的诊断结果是:80份中有49份(61%)为皮炎;38份(48%)为擦伤、溃疡或糜烂;25份(31%)为非特异性皮肤炎症。患者提供的标本大多由评估患者的医生(通常为皮肤科医生)进行评估,不过80份样本中有20份(25%)被送去做病理评估。在这80份标本中,10份(13%)含有昆虫。除1只昆虫外,其余均为非寄生性品种;1只(1%)为阴虱。其余发现包括皮肤碎屑、环境残渣或植物材料。
在疑似妄想性寄生虫感染的患者中,皮肤活检和对患者提供标本的检查均未提供皮肤寄生虫感染的客观证据。