Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 19;11:108. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-108.
There is an increasing recognition that modelling and simulation can assist in the process of designing health care policies, strategies and operations. However, the current use is limited and answers to questions such as what methods to use and when remain somewhat underdeveloped.
The aim of this study is to provide a mechanism for decision makers in health services planning and management to compare a broad range of modelling and simulation methods so that they can better select and use them or better commission relevant modelling and simulation work.
This paper proposes a modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool developed from a comprehensive literature review, the research team's extensive expertise and inputs from potential users. Twenty-eight different methods were identified, characterised by their relevance to different application areas, project life cycle stages, types of output and levels of insight, and four input resources required (time, money, knowledge and data).
The characterisation is presented in matrix forms to allow quick comparison and selection. This paper also highlights significant knowledge gaps in the existing literature when assessing the applicability of particular approaches to health services management, where modelling and simulation skills are scarce let alone money and time.
A modelling and simulation method comparison and selection tool is developed to assist with the selection of methods appropriate to supporting specific decision making processes. In particular it addresses the issue of which method is most appropriate to which specific health services management problem, what the user might expect to be obtained from the method, and what is required to use the method. In summary, we believe the tool adds value to the scarce existing literature on methods comparison and selection.
越来越多的人认识到,建模和模拟可以帮助设计医疗保健政策、策略和运营。然而,目前的使用有限,对于应该使用什么方法以及何时使用等问题的答案仍然有些不明确。
本研究旨在为卫生服务规划和管理的决策者提供一种机制,以便对广泛的建模和模拟方法进行比较,从而更好地选择和使用这些方法,或者更好地委托相关的建模和模拟工作。
本文提出了一种建模和模拟方法比较和选择工具,该工具是通过全面的文献回顾、研究团队的广泛专业知识以及潜在用户的投入开发的。确定了 28 种不同的方法,其特点是与不同的应用领域、项目生命周期阶段、输出类型和洞察水平相关,并需要四种输入资源(时间、资金、知识和数据)。
该特征以矩阵形式呈现,以便快速比较和选择。本文还强调了在评估特定方法在卫生服务管理中的适用性时,现有文献中的重要知识差距,在建模和模拟技能稀缺的情况下,更不用说资金和时间了。
开发了一种建模和模拟方法比较和选择工具,以帮助选择适合特定决策过程的方法。特别是,它解决了哪个方法最适合哪个特定的卫生服务管理问题,用户可能期望从该方法中获得什么,以及使用该方法需要什么的问题。总之,我们相信该工具为稀缺的现有方法比较和选择文献增加了价值。