de Jong Leo, Lafuma Antoine, Aguadé Anne-Sophie, Berdeaux Gilles
Academic Medical Centre, Ophthalmology Department, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:527-33. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S18565. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery.
Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication.
The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation.
This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.
本研究比较了EX-PRESS青光眼引流装置与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼术后长达五年的疗效。
来自一项先前报道的随机、开放标签、平行组临床试验的患者,其中78例患者接受了EX-PRESS青光眼引流装置或小梁切除术,在原研究之后又随访了长达四年(总共五年)(每个治疗组39只眼)。获得了青光眼手术后长达五年的风险效益数据。结果变量为眼压和眼压药物。眼压值≤18 mmHg且无需药物治疗定义为完全成功。
从第1年(86.8%对61.5%,P = 0.01)到第3年(66.7%对41.0%,P = 0.02),EX-PRESS青光眼引流装置在无需药物治疗的情况下,比小梁切除术能更有效地控制更多患者的眼压。在第1年,EX-PRESS植入术后仅12.8%的患者需要使用眼压药物,而小梁切除术后为35.9%。在第5年时这一比例更为接近(41%对53.9%)。EX-PRESS的缓解率更高,失败时间更长。此外,EX-PRESS植入术后并发症的手术干预较少。
这项为期五年的分析证实并扩展了一年后报道的结果。与小梁切除术相比,EX-PRESS在前三年能更好地控制眼压,且在五年研究期间患者需要的眼压药物更少,手术干预也更少。对于原发性开角型青光眼患者,在浅层巩膜瓣下植入EX-PRESS青光眼引流装置的成功率显著高于小梁切除术。EX-PRESS是治疗原发性开角型青光眼的一种有效装置。