Suppr超能文献

用于四角关节融合术的三种固定技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques used for four-corner arthrodesis.

作者信息

Kraisarin J, Dennison D G, Berglund L J, An K N, Shin A Y

机构信息

Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Sep;36(7):560-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193411406799. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

Abstract

Clinical results following four-corner arthrodesis vary and suggest that nonunion may be related to certain fixation techniques. The purpose of our study was to examine the displacement between the lunate and capitate following a simulated four-corner arthrodesis with the hypothesis that three types of fixation (Kirschner wires, dorsal circular plate, and a locked dorsal circular plate) would allow different amounts of displacement during simulated wrist flexion and extension. Cadaver wrists with simulated four-corner arthrodeses were loaded cyclically either to implant failure or until the lunocapitate displacement exceeded 1 mm. The locked dorsal circular plate group was significantly more stable than the dorsal circular plate and K-wire groups (p = 0.018 and p = 0.006). While these locked dorsal circular plates appear to be very stable our results are limited only to the biomechanical behavior of these fixation techniques within a cadaver model.

摘要

四角关节融合术后的临床结果各不相同,这表明骨不连可能与某些固定技术有关。我们研究的目的是在模拟四角关节融合术后检查月骨和头状骨之间的位移情况,假设三种固定方式(克氏针、背侧圆形钢板和锁定背侧圆形钢板)在模拟腕关节屈伸过程中会产生不同程度的位移。对模拟四角关节融合术的尸体腕关节进行循环加载,直至植入物失效或月头状骨位移超过1毫米。锁定背侧圆形钢板组比背侧圆形钢板组和克氏针组明显更稳定(p = 0.018和p = 0.006)。虽然这些锁定背侧圆形钢板看起来非常稳定,但我们的结果仅限于这些固定技术在尸体模型中的生物力学行为。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验