Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e503-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.066. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
To evaluate and compare outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated in a single institution with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).
One hundred and nineteen patients (SRS = 78, SRT = 41) were treated. For both SRS and SRT, beam shaping is performed by a mini-multileaf collimator. For SRS, a median single dose of 12.5 Gy (range, 11-14 Gy), prescribed to the 80% isodose line encompassing the target, was applied. Of the 42 SRT treatments, 32 treatments consisted of 10 fractions of 3-4 Gy, and 10 patients received 25 sessions of 2 Gy, prescribed to the 100% with the 95% isodose line encompassing the planning target volume. Mean largest tumor diameter was 16.6 mm in the SRS and 24.6 mm in the SRT group. Local tumor control, cranial nerve toxicity, and preservation of useful hearing were recorded. Any new treatment-induced cranial nerve neuropathy was scored as a complication.
Median follow-up was 62 months (range, 6-136 months), 5 patients progressed, resulting in an overall 5-year local tumor control of 95%. The overall 5-year facial nerve preservation probability was 88% and facial nerve neuropathy was statistically significantly higher after SRS, after prior surgery, for larger tumors, and in Koos Grade ≥3. The overall 5-year trigeminal nerve preservation probability was 96%, not significantly influenced by any of the risk factors. The overall 4-year probability of preservation of useful hearing (Gardner-Robertson score 1 or 2) was 68%, not significantly different between SRS or SRT (59% vs. 82%, p = 0.089, log rank).
Linac-based RT results in good local control and acceptable clinical outcome in small to medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Radiosurgery for large VSs (Koos Grade ≥3) remains a challenge because of increased facial nerve neuropathy.
评估和比较在单一机构中接受直线加速器立体定向放射外科(SRS)或分次立体定向放射治疗(SRT)治疗的前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)患者的治疗结果。
119 例患者(SRS=78,SRT=41)接受了治疗。对于 SRS 和 SRT,束成型均采用迷你多叶准直器完成。对于 SRS,应用的中位单次剂量为 12.5Gy(范围,11-14Gy),处方剂量为包含靶区的 80%等剂量曲线。在 42 次 SRT 治疗中,32 次治疗包括 10 次 3-4Gy 分割,10 例患者接受 25 次 2Gy 治疗,处方剂量为包含计划靶区的 100%,采用 95%等剂量曲线。SRS 组和 SRT 组的最大肿瘤直径平均值分别为 16.6mm 和 24.6mm。记录局部肿瘤控制、颅神经毒性和有用听力的保留情况。任何新的治疗诱导性颅神经神经病均被评为并发症。
中位随访时间为 62 个月(范围,6-136 个月),5 例患者病情进展,导致整体 5 年局部肿瘤控制率为 95%。整体 5 年面神经保留概率为 88%,SRS 后、先前手术、肿瘤较大和 Koos 分级≥3 时,面神经神经病统计学上显著更高。整体 5 年三叉神经保留概率为 96%,不受任何危险因素的显著影响。整体 4 年有用听力保留率(Gardner-Robertson 评分 1 或 2)为 68%,SRS 和 SRT 之间无显著差异(59%与 82%,p=0.089,对数秩检验)。
直线加速器放射治疗可使小至中等大小的前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)获得良好的局部控制和可接受的临床结果。对于大型 VS(Koos 分级≥3),放射外科仍然是一个挑战,因为面神经神经病的发生率增加。