Department of Biotechnology, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Cell Mol Immunol. 2011 Nov;8(6):453-61. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2011.17. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
Incidences of allergic disease have recently increased worldwide. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has long been a controversial treatment for allergic diseases. Although beneficial effects on clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in clinical trials by subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. Mucosal immunotherapy is one advantageous choice because of its non-injection routes of administration and lower side-effect profile. This study reviews recent progress in mucosal immunotherapy for allergic diseases. Administration routes, antigen quality and quantity, and adjuvants used are major considerations in this field. Also, direct uses of unique probiotics, or specific cytokines, have been discussed. Furthermore, some researchers have reported new therapeutic ideas that combine two or more strategies. The most important strategy for development of mucosal therapies for allergic diseases is the improvement of antigen formulation, which includes continuous searching for efficient adjuvants, collecting more information about dominant T-cell epitopes of allergens, and having the proper combination of each. In clinics, when compared to other mucosal routes, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a preferred choice for therapeutic administration, although local and systemic side effects have been reported. Additionally, not every allergen has the same beneficial effect. Further studies are needed to determine the benefits of mucosal immunotherapy for different allergic diseases after comparison of the different administration routes in children and adults. Data collected from large, well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized trials, with post-treatment follow-up, can provide robust substantiation of current evidence.
近年来,过敏性疾病的发病率在全球范围内有所增加。过敏原特异性免疫疗法(SIT)长期以来一直是治疗过敏性疾病的一种有争议的治疗方法。尽管皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)的临床试验已经证明了对临床相关结局的有益影响,但仍然存在严重甚至有时致命的过敏反应的风险。黏膜免疫疗法是一种有利的选择,因为它具有非注射给药途径和较低的副作用谱。本研究综述了过敏性疾病黏膜免疫疗法的最新进展。在该领域,给药途径、抗原质量和数量以及使用的佐剂是主要考虑因素。此外,还讨论了独特益生菌或特定细胞因子的直接应用。此外,一些研究人员报告了一些新的治疗思路,这些思路结合了两种或更多的策略。开发过敏性疾病黏膜疗法的最重要策略是改善抗原配方,包括不断寻找有效的佐剂,收集更多关于过敏原优势 T 细胞表位的信息,以及正确组合每种方法。在临床上,与其他黏膜途径相比,舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)是治疗给药的首选,尽管已经报道了局部和全身副作用。此外,并非每种过敏原都有相同的有益效果。需要进一步的研究来确定黏膜免疫疗法对不同过敏性疾病的益处,方法是在儿童和成人中比较不同给药途径。从大型、精心设计、双盲、安慰剂对照和随机试验中收集的数据,并进行治疗后随访,可以为现有证据提供有力的支持。