Suppr超能文献

成功管理糖尿病的关键在于未参保患者的社会支持、观察性学习和转折点:一个安全网提供者的战略联盟研究。

Keys to successful diabetes self-management for uninsured patients: social support, observational learning, and turning points: a safety net providers' strategic alliance study.

机构信息

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;103(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30292-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine how medically uninsured patients who receive health care at federally qualified health centers and free clinics are able to successfully self-manage diabetes compared to patients who are less successful.

METHODS

Two distinct groups of patients with diabetes for 6 months or longer were enrolled: (1) successful, defined as those with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7% or less or a recent improvement of at least 2% (n=17); and (2) unsuccessful, defined as patients with HbAlc of at least 9% (n=9) and without recent improvement. Patients were interviewed about enabling factors, motivators, resources, and barriers to diabetes self-management. Data from interviews, chart reviews, and clinician surveys were analyzed using qualitative methods and statistical techniques.

RESULTS

African Americans comprised 57.7% of the sample and whites 38.5% (N=26). No significant differences were detected between successful and unsuccessful groups in age, race, education, or employment status. Clinicians rated unsuccessful patients as having more severe diabetes and significantly lower levels of control than successful patients. Compared to unsuccessful patients, successful patients more often reported having friends or family with diabetes, more frequently sought information about the disease, used evidence-based self-management strategies, held more accurate perceptions of their own diabetes control, and experienced "turning point" events that motivated increased efforts in disease management.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who successfully managed diabetes learned from diabetic family members and interpreted disease-related events as motivational turning points. It may be beneficial to incorporate social learning and motivational enhancement into diabetes interventions to increase patients' motivation for improved levels of self-management.

摘要

目的

研究在联邦合格健康中心和免费诊所接受医疗服务的未参保患者与那些自我管理糖尿病效果较差的患者相比,是如何成功地进行自我管理的。

方法

招募了两组患有糖尿病 6 个月或更长时间的患者:(1)成功组,定义为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平为 7%或更低,或最近至少提高了 2%(n=17);(2)不成功组,定义为 HbA1c 至少为 9%且最近没有改善的患者(n=9)。对患者进行了关于促进因素、动机、资源和糖尿病自我管理障碍的访谈。使用定性方法和统计技术对访谈、图表审查和临床医生调查的数据进行了分析。

结果

该样本中,非洲裔美国人占 57.7%,白人占 38.5%(N=26)。成功组和不成功组在年龄、种族、教育程度或就业状况方面没有显著差异。临床医生对不成功患者的评价是,他们的糖尿病病情更严重,控制水平明显低于成功患者。与不成功患者相比,成功患者更有可能报告有糖尿病患者的朋友或家人,更频繁地寻求有关疾病的信息,使用基于证据的自我管理策略,对自己的糖尿病控制有更准确的认识,并且经历了促使他们更努力地管理疾病的“转折点”事件。

结论

成功管理糖尿病的患者从糖尿病患者家庭成员那里学习,并将疾病相关事件解释为激励性的转折点。将社会学习和动机增强纳入糖尿病干预措施中,可能会提高患者改善自我管理水平的动机。

相似文献

5
Differential impact of recent Medicaid expansions by race and ethnicity.
Pediatrics. 2001 Nov;108(5):1135-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.5.1135.
6
Preventive care utilization among the uninsured by race/ethnicity and income.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes: the Coached Care (R2D2C2) project.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1340-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2452-y.
8
Profiles of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the extremes of glycemic control.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2655-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.031.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Screening Between Asian Americans and Other Adults: BRFSS 2012-2014.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):423-429. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3913-x. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
Baseline characteristics and Latino versus non-Latino contrasts among Bronx A1C study participants.
West J Nurs Res. 2014 Oct;36(9):1030-51. doi: 10.1177/0193945913517947. Epub 2014 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

4
Nutritional Literacy Among Uninsured Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Free Clinic Study.
Cureus. 2021 Jul 13;13(7):e16355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16355. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Impact of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Psychological Factors on Glycemic Self-Management in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;4:195. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00195. eCollection 2016.
9
Diabetes self-management in a low-income population: impacts of social support and relationships with the health care system.
Chronic Illn. 2013 Jun;9(2):145-55. doi: 10.1177/1742395313475674. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-10. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S004.
2
Depression, depression treatment, and insulin sensitivity in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Nov;86(2):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.06.024. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
3
Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations.
Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:7-20. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp005. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
4
Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial.
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;35(4):641-51. doi: 10.1177/0145721709335006. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
6
Examining a bidirectional association between depressive symptoms and diabetes.
JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2751-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.23.2751.
7
Ethnic disparities in diabetes care: myth or reality?
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008 Apr;15(2):128-34. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3282f5dbb8.
8
Neighborhoods and obesity.
Nutr Rev. 2008 Jan;66(1):2-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.00001.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验