Uchiyama K, Ino H, Hayashi K, Fujioka K, Takabatake S, Yokawa J, Namura M, Mizuno S, Tatami R, Kanaya H, Nitta Y, Michishita I, Hirase H, Ueda K, Aoyama T, Okeie K, Haraki T, Mori K, Araki T, Minamoto M, Oiwake H, Konno T, Sakata K, Kawashiri M, Yamagishi M
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
J Int Med Res. 2011;39(2):549-57. doi: 10.1177/147323001103900224.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a drug-eluting stent (DES) leads to less re-stenosis than PCI using a bare metal stent (BMS), however there is still controversy whether use of a DES for severe coronary disease leads to an acceptable outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study 8159 lesions were treated in 6739 patients (mean age 68.9 years) with coronary artery disease. Use of a DES significantly decreased the re-stenosis rate compared with BMS in both DM (9.6% versus 21.3%) and non-DM (9.5% versus 17.1%) patients. The re-stenosis rate was significantly higher in DM than in non-DM patients in the BMS group but not in the DES group. There was no statistically significant difference in event-free survival after stenting of patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease between the BMS and DES groups. It was concluded that, compared with BMS, DES reduced re-stenosis in patients with DM, however, we advise careful treatment after using DES for severe coronary disease, including LMCA lesions, in patients with DM.
与使用裸金属支架(BMS)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,使用药物洗脱支架(DES)进行PCI导致的再狭窄更少,然而,对于患有糖尿病(DM)的严重冠状动脉疾病患者,使用DES是否能带来可接受的结果仍存在争议。在本研究中,对6739例(平均年龄68.9岁)冠状动脉疾病患者的8159处病变进行了治疗。在DM患者(9.6%对21.3%)和非DM患者(9.5%对17.1%)中,与BMS相比,使用DES均显著降低了再狭窄率。在BMS组中,DM患者的再狭窄率显著高于非DM患者,但在DES组中并非如此。BMS组和DES组中左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病患者支架置入后的无事件生存率无统计学显著差异。得出的结论是,与BMS相比,DES降低了DM患者的再狭窄率,然而,我们建议对患有DM的严重冠状动脉疾病患者,包括LMCA病变患者,在使用DES后进行谨慎治疗。